Page 116 - Read Online
P. 116

Shen et al. Art Int Surg. 2025;5:150-9  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ais.2024.71                                                             Page 158

               23.      Necker FN, Cholok DJ, Fischer MJ, et al. HoloDIEP-faster and more accurate intraoperative DIEA perforator mapping using a novel
                   mixed reality tool. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2024.  DOI
               24.      Ghasroddashti A, Guyn C, Martou G, Edmunds RW. Utility of 3D-printed vascular modeling in microsurgical breast reconstruction: a
                   systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024;96:95-104.  DOI  PubMed
               25.      Ballard DH, Mills P, Duszak R Jr, Weisman JA, Rybicki FJ, Woodard PK. Medical 3D printing cost-savings in orthopedic and
                   maxillofacial surgery: cost analysis of operating room time saved with 3D printed anatomic models and surgical guides. Acad Radiol.
                   2020;27:1103-13.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               26.      Ravi P, Burch MB, Farahani S, et al; University of Cincinnati 3D Printing Clinical Service Participants. Utility and costs during the
                   initial year of 3D printing in an academic hospital. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023;20:193-204.  DOI
               27.      Cifuentes IJ, Dagnino BL, Salisbury MC, Perez ME, Ortega C, Maldonado D. Augmented reality and dynamic infrared thermography
                   for perforator mapping in the anterolateral thigh. Arch Plast Surg. 2018;45:284-8.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               28.      Hudson T, Hogue E, Mullner D, Herrera F, Scomacao I. The utility of smartphone-based thermal imaging in the management and
                   monitoring of microvascular flap procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2023;90:S420-5.  DOI  PubMed
               29.      Huang RW, Tsai TY, Hsieh YH, et al. Reliability of postoperative free flap monitoring with a novel prediction model based on
                   supervised machine learning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;152:943e-52e.  DOI
               30.      Hsu SY, Chen LW, Huang RW, et al. Quantization of extraoral free flap monitoring for venous congestion with deep learning
                   integrated iOS applications on smartphones: a diagnostic study. Int J Surg. 2023;109:1584-93.  DOI
               31.      Kim J, Lee SM, Kim DE, et al. Development of an automated free flap monitoring system based on artificial intelligence. JAMA Netw
                   Open. 2024;7:e2424299.  DOI
               32.      Lee C, Chen C, Wang H, Chen L, Perng C. Utilizing mask RCNN for monitoring postoperative free flap: circulatory compromise
                   detection based on visible-light and infrared images. IEEE Access. 2022;10:109510-25.  DOI
               33.      Ramkumar PN, Haeberle HS, Bloomfield MR, et al. Artificial intelligence and arthroplasty at a single institution: real-world
                   applications of machine learning to big data, value-based care, mobile health, and remote patient monitoring. J Arthroplasty.
                   2019;34:2204-9.  DOI
               34.      Shi YC, Li J, Li SJ, et al. Flap failure prediction in microvascular tissue reconstruction using machine learning algorithms. World J
                   Clin Cases. 2022;10:3729-38.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               35.      Wang SY, Barrette LX, Ng JJ, et al. Predicting reoperation and readmission for head and neck free flap patients using machine
                   learning. Head Neck. 2024;46:1999-2009.  DOI
               36.      Hassan AM, Biaggi-Ondina A, Asaad M, et al. Artificial intelligence modeling to predict periprosthetic infection and explantation
                   following implant-based reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;152:929-38.  DOI
               37.      Braun SE, Sinik LM, Meyer AM, Larson KE, Butterworth JA. Predicting complications in breast reconstruction: development and
                   prospective validation of a machine learning model. Ann Plast Surg. 2023;91:282-6.  DOI  PubMed
               38.      Plastic surgery statistics. American society of plastic surgeons. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/plastic-surgery-
                   statistics. [Last accessed on 30 Dec 2024].
               39.      Masoomi H, Hanson SE, Clemens MW, Mericli AF. Autologous breast reconstruction trends in the United States: using the nationwide
                   inpatient sample database. Ann Plast Surg. 2021;87:242-7.  DOI  PubMed
               40.      Fracol M, Teven CM, Selimos B, et al. Pushing the DIEP envelope with ERAS: 24 hour discharge is safe in appropriately selected
                   patients. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023;11:e5070.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               41.      Sauro KM, Smith C, Ibadin S, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines and hospital length of stay, readmission,
                   complications, and mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7:e2417310.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               42.      Vecchio D, Stein MJ, Dayan E, Marte J, Theodorou S. Nanotechnology and artificial intelligence: an emerging paradigm for
                   postoperative patient care. Aesthet Surg J. 2023;43:748-57.  DOI  PubMed
               43.      Pfob A, Mehrara BJ, Nelson JA, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL, Sidey-Gibbons C. Machine learning to predict individual patient-reported
                   outcomes at 2-year follow-up for women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and breast reconstruction (INSPiRED-001). Breast.
                   2021;60:111-22.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               44.      Davis L. Northwell releases AI-driven pregnancy chatbot | Northwell Health. January 11, 2023. Available from: https://www.
                   northwell.edu/news/the-latest/northwell-releases-ai-driven-pregnancy-chatbot. [Last accessed on 30 Dec 2024].
               45.      Vallurupalli M, Shah ND, Vyas RM. Optimizing readability of patient-facing hand surgery education materials using Chat Generative
                   Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) 3.5. J Hand Surg Am. 2024;49:986-91.  DOI  PubMed
               46.      FDA news release. FDA strengthens safety requirements and updates study results for breast implants. FDA. October 28, 2021.
                   Available from: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-strengthens-safety-requirements-and-updates-study-
                   results-breast-implants. [Last accessed on 30 Dec 2024].
               47.      Cohen WA, Ballard TN, Hamill JB, et al. Understanding and optimizing the patient experience in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast
                   Surg. 2016;77:237-41.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               48.      Vargas CR, Koolen PGL, Chuang DJ, Ganor O, Lee BT. Online patient resources for breast reconstruction: an analysis of readability.
                   Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:406-13.  DOI  PubMed
               49.      Farid Y, Fernando Botero Gutierrez L, Ortiz S, et al. Artificial intelligence in plastic surgery: insights from plastic surgeons, education
                   integration, ChatGPT's survey predictions, and the path forward. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024;12:e5515.  DOI
               50.      Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001;323:42-6.
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121