Page 116 - Read Online

Shen et al. Art Int Surg. 2025;5:150-9 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ais.2024.71 Page 158

23. Necker FN, Cholok DJ, Fischer MJ, et al. HoloDIEP-faster and more accurate intraoperative DIEA perforator mapping using a novel
mixed reality tool. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2024. DOI
24. Ghasroddashti A, Guyn C, Martou G, Edmunds RW. Utility of 3D-printed vascular modeling in microsurgical breast reconstruction: a
systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024;96:95-104. DOI PubMed
25. Ballard DH, Mills P, Duszak R Jr, Weisman JA, Rybicki FJ, Woodard PK. Medical 3D printing cost-savings in orthopedic and
maxillofacial surgery: cost analysis of operating room time saved with 3D printed anatomic models and surgical guides. Acad Radiol.
2020;27:1103-13. DOI PubMed PMC
26. Ravi P, Burch MB, Farahani S, et al; University of Cincinnati 3D Printing Clinical Service Participants. Utility and costs during the
initial year of 3D printing in an academic hospital. J Am Coll Radiol. 2023;20:193-204. DOI
27. Cifuentes IJ, Dagnino BL, Salisbury MC, Perez ME, Ortega C, Maldonado D. Augmented reality and dynamic infrared thermography
for perforator mapping in the anterolateral thigh. Arch Plast Surg. 2018;45:284-8. DOI PubMed PMC
28. Hudson T, Hogue E, Mullner D, Herrera F, Scomacao I. The utility of smartphone-based thermal imaging in the management and
monitoring of microvascular flap procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2023;90:S420-5. DOI PubMed
29. Huang RW, Tsai TY, Hsieh YH, et al. Reliability of postoperative free flap monitoring with a novel prediction model based on
supervised machine learning. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;152:943e-52e. DOI
30. Hsu SY, Chen LW, Huang RW, et al. Quantization of extraoral free flap monitoring for venous congestion with deep learning
integrated iOS applications on smartphones: a diagnostic study. Int J Surg. 2023;109:1584-93. DOI
31. Kim J, Lee SM, Kim DE, et al. Development of an automated free flap monitoring system based on artificial intelligence. JAMA Netw
Open. 2024;7:e2424299. DOI
32. Lee C, Chen C, Wang H, Chen L, Perng C. Utilizing mask RCNN for monitoring postoperative free flap: circulatory compromise
detection based on visible-light and infrared images. IEEE Access. 2022;10:109510-25. DOI
33. Ramkumar PN, Haeberle HS, Bloomfield MR, et al. Artificial intelligence and arthroplasty at a single institution: real-world
applications of machine learning to big data, value-based care, mobile health, and remote patient monitoring. J Arthroplasty.
2019;34:2204-9. DOI
34. Shi YC, Li J, Li SJ, et al. Flap failure prediction in microvascular tissue reconstruction using machine learning algorithms. World J
Clin Cases. 2022;10:3729-38. DOI PubMed PMC
35. Wang SY, Barrette LX, Ng JJ, et al. Predicting reoperation and readmission for head and neck free flap patients using machine
learning. Head Neck. 2024;46:1999-2009. DOI
36. Hassan AM, Biaggi-Ondina A, Asaad M, et al. Artificial intelligence modeling to predict periprosthetic infection and explantation
following implant-based reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;152:929-38. DOI
37. Braun SE, Sinik LM, Meyer AM, Larson KE, Butterworth JA. Predicting complications in breast reconstruction: development and
prospective validation of a machine learning model. Ann Plast Surg. 2023;91:282-6. DOI PubMed
38. Plastic surgery statistics. American society of plastic surgeons. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/plastic-surgery-
statistics. [Last accessed on 30 Dec 2024].
39. Masoomi H, Hanson SE, Clemens MW, Mericli AF. Autologous breast reconstruction trends in the United States: using the nationwide
inpatient sample database. Ann Plast Surg. 2021;87:242-7. DOI PubMed
40. Fracol M, Teven CM, Selimos B, et al. Pushing the DIEP envelope with ERAS: 24 hour discharge is safe in appropriately selected
patients. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023;11:e5070. DOI PubMed PMC
41. Sauro KM, Smith C, Ibadin S, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines and hospital length of stay, readmission,
complications, and mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7:e2417310. DOI PubMed PMC
42. Vecchio D, Stein MJ, Dayan E, Marte J, Theodorou S. Nanotechnology and artificial intelligence: an emerging paradigm for
postoperative patient care. Aesthet Surg J. 2023;43:748-57. DOI PubMed
43. Pfob A, Mehrara BJ, Nelson JA, Wilkins EG, Pusic AL, Sidey-Gibbons C. Machine learning to predict individual patient-reported
outcomes at 2-year follow-up for women undergoing cancer-related mastectomy and breast reconstruction (INSPiRED-001). Breast.
2021;60:111-22. DOI PubMed PMC
44. Davis L. Northwell releases AI-driven pregnancy chatbot | Northwell Health. January 11, 2023. Available from: https://www.
northwell.edu/news/the-latest/northwell-releases-ai-driven-pregnancy-chatbot. [Last accessed on 30 Dec 2024].
45. Vallurupalli M, Shah ND, Vyas RM. Optimizing readability of patient-facing hand surgery education materials using Chat Generative
Pretrained Transformer (ChatGPT) 3.5. J Hand Surg Am. 2024;49:986-91. DOI PubMed
46. FDA news release. FDA strengthens safety requirements and updates study results for breast implants. FDA. October 28, 2021.
Available from: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-strengthens-safety-requirements-and-updates-study-
results-breast-implants. [Last accessed on 30 Dec 2024].
47. Cohen WA, Ballard TN, Hamill JB, et al. Understanding and optimizing the patient experience in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast
Surg. 2016;77:237-41. DOI PubMed PMC
48. Vargas CR, Koolen PGL, Chuang DJ, Ganor O, Lee BT. Online patient resources for breast reconstruction: an analysis of readability.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:406-13. DOI PubMed
49. Farid Y, Fernando Botero Gutierrez L, Ortiz S, et al. Artificial intelligence in plastic surgery: insights from plastic surgeons, education
integration, ChatGPT's survey predictions, and the path forward. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024;12:e5515. DOI
50. Jüni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001;323:42-6.