Page 17 - Read Online
P. 17

Page 242                                                          Giakas et al. Art Int Surg 2024;4:233-46  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/ais.2024.24

               - Causes less tissue disruption and reduces postoperative pain.
               - Often leads to faster recovery and shorter hospital stays.
               - Different techniques include tubular retractor, endoscopic, and microendoscopic approaches.


               Attending 1 Score: 3
               Attending 2 Score: 2

               Analysis: While the complete response offered a broad list of potential approaches to PLD, the descriptions
               for many approaches were incomplete and misleading. For example, the reviewers felt that in the
               description of a corpectomy, ChatGPT neglected to mention that after the removal of a vertebral body,
               some patients may require cage placement to restore height. Additionally, several of the approaches, such as
               facetectomy and corpectomy, would not be used for a simple PLD and would necessitate concomitant
               fusion. The claims regarding some of the advantages of MISS were felt to not be fully representative of the
               literature [33-35] . As such, these responses were viewed as not wholly accurate and possibly confusing to
               patients considering their options before surgery.

               10. Which approach is better for lumbar decompression?
               The choice of approach for lumbar decompression surgery depends on various factors, including your
               specific condition, the underlying cause of your symptoms, the surgeon’s expertise, and your individual
               needs. There are different surgical approaches that can be used for lumbar decompression, and what might
               be considered “better” depends on your unique situation.

               - Condition: The type and severity of your spinal condition play a significant role in determining the
               appropriate approach.
               - Health status: Your overall health, medical history, and any existing medical conditions might impact
               which approach is safer for you.
               - Surgical expertise: The surgeon’s experience and expertise with a particular approach are important
               factors.
               - Patient preference: Discuss your goals, concerns, and expectations with your surgeon to choose an
               approach that aligns with your needs.
               - Recovery goals: Consider your desired recovery timeline and how much downtime you can afford.


               Attending 1 Score: 3
               Attending 2 Score: 3


               Analysis: This response provides a cursory overview of different approaches. However, it fails to provide
               evidence-based advantages or drawbacks for the different techniques. In addition, the responses are vague
               and do not sufficiently address the question or the nuances thereof. As such, it lacks both the specificity and
               evidence-based support to be helpful to patients considering surgery. Like the prior responses, there appears
               to be a plateauing of new information, even with different questions surrounding the same topic.


               Average Attending Score: 2.95


               DISCUSSION
               The advent of online search engines has incited a change in how patients interact with medical information
               and, therefore, their physicians. New, open-access AI chatbot technology represents a revolutionary
               moment in medicine regarding how patients learn about their medical conditions. Given the potential
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22