Page 144 - Read Online
P. 144

Page 16 of 20                  Akinci et al. Vessel Plus 2021;5:56  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2021.20

               ENOS trial, a subset of patients who were taking antihypertensive drugs before their stroke were randomly
               assigned to either continue or stop taking these drugs, and no evidence was found to support continuing
                                                                 [64]
               pre-stroke antihypertensive drugs in the first few days . To date, there is no evidence to support
               continuing or discontinuing pre-stroke antihypertensive drugs in patients within the first few days after
               ICH. However, even if they are discontinued, oral antihypertensive agents should be started as soon as
               possible (preferably 24 to 48 h after symptom onset, because most of the acute processes are uncommon
               after the first 24 h) to control resistant hypertension and facilitate the transition to long-term management
               for secondary prophylaxis.

               CONCLUSION
               While current trials have shown that intensive BP lowering is clinically feasible and potentially safe, the
               treatment threshold, BP target, therapeutic window, medications to be used and whether such treatment
               improves clinical outcomes remain unclear. Current guidelines cannot provide clear answers to these
               uncertainties. Almost all randomized clinical trials included patients receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelets
                                                                                 3
               with different rates and different criteria (while a platelet count < 100.000 mm  was required to be included
                                              3
               in the ATACH study, < 50.000 mm  was required in the ATACH-2 study; while international normalize
               ratio < 1.8 was required to include patients receiving warfarin in the study of Koch et al. , < 1.4 was
                                                                                               [52]
               required in the ATACH study, etc). The small sample sizes and heterogeneous criteria make it difficult to
               understand whether we should make individual changes in the treatment of these patients’ acute
               hypertensive response [48,52,58] . The safety of the current SBP reduction therapies in patients with severe
               disease, large hematomas, ICP elevation, and impaired cerebral perfusion pressure is unknown as they were
               not represented in clinical trials. The therapeutic target for SBP lowering may vary between individual
               patients, depending on individual cerebral hemodynamics. An example is the investigation of the safety and
                                                                                      [50]
               effectiveness of intensive BP lowering in ICH patients with cerebrovascular stenosis . The results of future
               studies may reveal the need for an individualized treatment with CBF and regional ICP measurements.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Wrote the first draft of the manuscript: Akinci Y
               Discussed the results and commented on the manuscript at all stages: Qureshi AI
               Read and approved the final manuscript: Akinci Y, Qureshi AI


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               Both authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149