Page 27 - Read Online

Dewantoro et al. Vessel Plus 2018;2:20 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2018.50 Page 7 of 9

CONCLUSION
TACABG takes a longer preparation as compared to non-total arterial CABG. However, whenever it is pos-
sible to perform TACABG, the short- and long-term survival were better as compared to VCABG. In addi-
tion, the patency of arterial conduits has been shown to be longer lasting and less prone to damage as com-
pared to venous conduits. While there was a similar 30-day outcome in both TACABG and VCABG groups,
the long-term mortality rate was higher in the VCABG group as compared to TACABG. Among the arteries
available to be conduits, internal thoracic arteries by far provides the best outcome, even for those with
higher risk of complications.

DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributions
Manuscript conception: Dewantoro D, Spadaccio C
Literature search, writing the draft: Dewantoro D, Satriano U
Critical revision of the manuscript, writing the revised version: Nenna A, Spadaccio C
Critical revision of the manuscript: Chello M

Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.

Financial support and sponsorship
None.

Conflicts of interest
All authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.

Consent for publication
Not applicable.

Copyright
© The Author(s) 2018.

REFERENCES
1. Mackay J, Mensah GA, Greenlund K. The atlas of heart disease and stroke. World Health Organization, 2004.
2. Stone GW, Sabik JF, Serruys PW, Simonton CA, Généreux P, Puskas J, Kandzari DE, Morice MC, Lembo N, Brown WM 3rd, Tag-
gart DP, Banning A, Merkely B, Horkay F, Boonstra PW, van Boven AJ, Ungi I, Bogáts G, Mansour S, Noiseux N, Sabaté M, Pomar
J, Hickey M, Gershlick A, Buszman P, Bochenek A, Schampaert E, Pagé P, Dressler O, Kosmidou I, Mehran R, Pocock SJ, Kappetein
AP; EXCEL Trial Investigators. Everolimus-eluting stents or bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med
2016;375:2223-35.
3. Al-Sabti HA, Al Kindi A, Al-Rasadi K, Banerjee Y, Al-Hashmi K, Al-Hinai A. Saphenous vein graft vs. radial artery graft searching for
the best second coronary artery bypass graft. J Saudi Heart Assoc 2013;25:247-54.
4. Tatoulis J, Wynne R, Skillington PD, Buxton BF. Total arterial revascularization: achievable and prognostically effective-a multi-
center analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2015;100:1268-75; discussion 1275.
5. Anyanwu AC, Saeed I, Bustami M, Ilsley C, Yacoub MH, Amrani M. Does routine use of the radial artery increase complexity or mor-
bidity of coronary bypass surgery? Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:555-9; discussion 559-60.
6. Maruthappu M, Duclos A, Lipsitz SR, Orgill D, Carty MJ. Surgical learning curves and operative efficiency: a cross-specialty observa-
tional study. BMJ Open 2015;5:e006679.
7. Gaudino M, Crea F, Cammertoni F, Mazza A, Toesca A, Massetti M. Technical issues in the use of the radial artery as a coronary artery