Page 132 - Read Online
P. 132

Gomes et al. Vessel Plus 2023;7:24  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2023.60  Page 11 of 16

               presenting this adverse event. NIRS can be maintained in the intensive care unit for monitoring high-risk
               patients, although there is no consensus recommending its use and no sufficient evidence available for a
               precise cutoff that would be concerning for SCI.


               The maneuvers described above should also be implemented for the cases with postoperative SCI. MAP
               above 90 mmHg and hemoglobin above 10 mg/dL are goals that should be pursued in these cases. If a
               prophylactic spinal drain was inserted, a therapeutic drain should be placed with the purpose of keeping
               CSFP below 10 mmHg. If the neurologic deficits do not improve as expected, lower CSFP values can be
               attempted as a heroic maneuver up to the discretion of the surgical team assisting the patient. However, in
               addition to the high risk of intracranial bleeding from aggressive CSF drainage, there is no consensus
               recommending this practice to date.


               The use of therapeutic CSF drainage can also be indicated even in those cases presenting delayed-onset SCI
                                                                     [108]
               symptoms, with satisfactory results reported in the literature . Weissler et al. suggest that permissive
               hypertension (systolic blood pressure up to 150 mmHg) during the first month after TEVAR could also aid
               in the protection against SCI .
                                       [109]
               Finally, the use of high-dose steroids as part of a rescue protocol is described in the literature, even in cases
               with a delayed presentation of SCI , but there is no consensus recommending this practice.
                                            [110]

               CONCLUSION
               Spinal cord ischemia prevention in the context of TAA or TAAA repair requires meticulous surgical
               planning including a thorough analysis of the contributions to spinal cord perfusion and repair extension,
               always evaluating the need for a staged approach. Careful perioperative strategies including hypotension
               avoidance and neuromonitoring, weighing the advantages and disadvantages of preoperative lumbar drain
               implantation are paramount in these cases. The strategies for preventing SCI discussed in this review can be
               applied in a combined fashion, depending on the patient’s anatomy and the planned repair. Vascular and
               cardiothoracic surgeons dedicated to the treatment of TAA and TAAA should be comfortable with all the
               SCI protective and rescue strategies in order to reduce the risk of this adverse event in this patient
               population.

               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Literature review; data interpretation; manuscript preparation; critical revision of the manuscript; approval
               of the manuscript: all authors.


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               Vivian Carla Gomes: no disclosures; Federico Ezequiel Parodi: Stock options from Centerline Biomedical;
               Mark A Farber: WL Gore - Consulting, Clinical Trial Support; Getinge - Consulting; Cook - Research
               support, Clinical Trial support; ViTTA - Consulting, Clinical Trial support; Centerline Biomedical - Stock
               options, Clinical Trial support.
   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137