Page 9 - Read Online
P. 9

Valcárcel-Nazco et al. Rare Dis Orphan Drugs J 2023;2:19  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/rdodj.2023.14  Page 3 of 11

               considered in depth and early on in the decision-making process. This is due to variations in treatment
               costs, hospital-billing policy, the requisite infrastructure (at all stages) and personnel cost of running the
               programme, as well as additional expertise and follow-up systems for surveillance. All of these aspects will
               affect the viability and sustainability of the NBS programme [6,30-33] . Aside from costs, additional unexplored
               variations in value judgments, driven by technological availability, social or professional pressure, or
                                                                                                       [34]
               political opportunity, usually not explicitly stated, could play a differential role in policy decision-making .
               There is no evidence to show that those populations who receive NBS for fewer disorders, such as in the
               UK, France, several Spanish regions, and Finland, are at a higher risk of poorer health outcomes than the
               populations of Austria, Italy, or Iceland, where NBS programmes cover more than 25 different conditions .
                                                                                                        [3]
               Moreover, governments are committed to ensuring the value of all health care provided to the population,
               as well as the long-term sustainability of the health care system per se. This commitment has recently been
               exacerbated by the double impact of the 2008 economic and financial crisis and the direct and collateral
               pandemic effects of COVID-19 .
                                         [35]

               EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTH POLICY INITIATIVES TO ENHANCE EQUITY AND
               EFFICIENCY FOR THE NBS PROGRAMME IN SPAIN
               The Spanish National Health Service (SNHS) is a decentralized public health insurance system with
               universal coverage, which provides free health care to every resident in all of the country’s Autonomous
               Regions (ARs). The SNHS is managed at a regional level and fully financed by national insurance
               contributions and taxes, though some regional governments allocate local budgets to provide additional
               funding.  The  national  government  established  three  health  policy  instruments  to  support  the
               decentralization  of  health  planning  and  management  competencies  in  each  ARs:  (1)  the  Spanish
               General Health  Care  Act,  guaranteeing  free  and  universal  healthcare  access  to  all  Spanish
               residents ;  (2)  the National  Benefits  Catalogue  to  ensure  equity  in  the  supply  of  healthcare
                       [36]
               services ; (3)  the  Inter-territorial Board of the SNHS (made up of central and regional public health
                      [37]
               authorities).  However,  even though  these  health-policy  instruments  were  established  early  to  ensure
               equity, homogeneity, and efficiency in a decentralized SNHS, variations have since occurred in the supply
                                                          [26]
               of healthcare services, including NBS programmes .

               Universal NBS, introduced in 1968 in Spain, is a well-established programme funded by every AR. It is
               currently organized through a network of 20 regional laboratories with an overall coverage of over 98% of
               the neonatal population. By 2000, the AR of Galicia had implemented a pioneering expanded NBS
               programme based on MS/MS for more than 40 conditions , at a time when the country’s remaining ARs
                                                                 [23]
               were mainly screening for phenylketonuria (PKU) and hypothyroidism. Despite the fact that the Galician
               programme was not expressly developed as a research initiative, it has nonetheless generated new
               knowledge about the true prevalence of a wide spectrum of disorders and relationships between biomarkers
               and disease expression in that region of Spain . Subsequently, the SNHS Cohesion and Quality was
                                                         [38]
               operationalized by means of Quality Plans supported by the Spanish Network for Health Technology
               Assessment (RedETS), with the aim of bolstering evidence-based health policies and limiting variations in
               the supply of healthcare services among ARs . As a result, there has been a growing demand for evidence
                                                     [39]
               and justification of value in the context of innovation and health technology assessment (HTA), whether to
               endorse funding, coverage, and reimbursement decisions or, alternatively, to support price negotiations .
                                                                                                      [40]

               To standardize the offer of NBS and reduce inequalities in the SNHS, the Spanish Ministry of Health
               prompted  the  creation  of  (1)  a  Framework  Document  to  guide  NBS  decisions  approved  by  the  Public
               Health Commission  of  the  SNHS  Inter-territorial  Board;  (2)  an  expert  group  to  develop
               recommendations  on  (i)  a  uniform  screening  panel;  (ii)  minimal  standards  for  NBS  in  all  ARs;
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14