Page 776 - Read Online
P. 776

Hontscharuk et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:65  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.124                           Page 13 of 15

               (1) masturbating their neophallus; and (2) achieving orgasm with stimulation of the phallus alone. This
               was independent of the treatment of the clitoris and supports the concept that additional factors contribute
               to the ability to achieve orgasm. One potential contributing factor is the improvement that occurs in one’s
                                                              [12]
                                          [12]
               identity following phalloplasty . van de Grift et al.  report the development of positive self-esteem
               and affirmation of a masculine identity following phalloplasty. This may facilitate engagement in and,
               enjoyment of, sexual activity including increased sexual initiative and pleasure.

               CONCLUSION
               While there is no consensus as to the optimal flap or the optimal pattern of innervation, tactile, and
               erogenous sensation following phalloplasty is an important goal. Understanding the relevant flap and donor
               site anatomy is important in optimizing outcomes, but there are likely multiple factors that contribute to
               both sexual satisfaction and orgasmic potential. Additional studies comparing various nerve coaptation
               strategies will help elucidate these issues.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Literature review, writing: Hontscharuk R, Siotos C
               Generation of an idea, editing, writing, photo contributor: Schechter LS


               Availability of data and materials
               All referenced publications can be searched and found on PubMed. These papers are available to all readers
               through published journal websites.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               Hontscharuk R and Siotos C have no potential conflicts; Schechter LS receives royalties from textbooks
               from Elsevier and Springer publishers.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Consent for publication has been obtained from the publisher of the anatomy textbook.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Meerwijk EL, Sevelius JM. Transgender population size in the United States: a meta-regression of population-based probability samples.
                   Am J Public Health 2017;107:e1-8.
               2.   Winter S, Diamond M, Green J, et al. Transgender people: health at the margins of society. Lancet 2016;388:390-400.
               3.   Tollinche LE, Walters CB, Radix A, et al. The perioperative care of the transgender patient. Anesth Analg 2018;127:359-66.
               4.   Tran BNN, Epstein S, Singhal D, et al. Gender affirmation surgery: a synopsis using American College of Surgeons National Surgery
                   Quality Improvement Program and National Inpatient Sample Databases. Ann Plast Surg 2018;80:S229-35.
               5.   American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Plastic Surgery Statistics. Available from: https://www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-
                   statistics. [Last accessed on 12 Oct 2020]
               6.   Al-Tamimi M, Pigot GL, Elfering L, et al. Genital gender-affirming surgery in transgender men in the Netherlands from 1989 to 2018: the
                   evolution of surgical care. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;145:153e-61.
   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781