Page 729 - Read Online
P. 729

Diaspro et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:62  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.143                                   Page 5 of 12




























                                    Figure 2. Anatomy and technical note focused articles: publication trend

                                                                       [11]
                                                               [44]
               The average study population was 71.37, ranging from 3  to 400  treated patients, along with a recorded
                                                                                           [24]
               mean follow-up of 18.2 months, ranging from 0.75 (3 weeks) [17,27,66]  to 96 months (8 years) .
               It is remarkable that the first two papers ever published on the topic already had 6.5 months of retrospective
                                                                                              [12]
                                           [11]
               follow-up of 400 treated patients , and 9 months of prospective follow-up of treated patients .
               Even though the lower eyelid and tear trough are considered difficult sites to be injected, only two papers
               focused on related anatomy were published in 2012 [58,60] , seven years after the technique was introduced [11,12] .
               Subsequently, the anatomy and the aging process of the tear trough region have started to be considered as
               strongly correlated to the midface  and thus, were no longer published as stand-alone topics [Figure 2].
                                            [61]
               The first papers focused on complications arising from lower eyelid and tear trough HA treatment were
                                                              [25]
                                           [39]
               published in 2012 by Dayan et al.  and Kashkouli et al. .
                                                                                                  [70]
               Articles focused on complications have since been constantly published [20,51,53-57,63,68,69] , up to 2020 , which
               highlights the technical complexities of this treatment that requires adequate skills for it to be properly
               performed [Figure 3].


               However, adverse events are occasionally reported in articles that are not directly related [13,17,22,28,32,39,71] .

               The most commonly reported complications include the Tyndall effect [51,63,69] , a blue-grey dyschromia, in up
                                                                                      [69]
               to 30.5% of cases ; contour irregularities [25,51,53,63,69]  ranging from 4.25%  to 30.5%  of cases; and chronic
                              [69]
                                                                            [51]
                                                                         [69]
               malar oedema [20,54,63,68-70]  that has been reported in up to 11% of cases .
               Minor or rarely reported complications secondary to lower eyelid and tear trough HA injections are orbital
                                                                                                       [29]
                                  [13]
                                                                    [25]
                                                          [39]
               cellulitis and migraine , delayed resorption of HA , diplopia , xanthelasma-like eyelid skin reactions ,
               granuloma formation [55,56]  and lacrimal duct obstruction  [Figure 4].
                                                              [57]
               The injection of an adequate dose of hyaluronidase has always been reported to be the best treatment [54,57,63,68-70] ,
   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734