Page 50 - Read Online
P. 50

Page 16 of 20                                        Azoury et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:4  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2019.44

               to find ways to provide these patients with means for obtaining better satisfaction and quality of life
               postoperatively. Despite the advances in VCA over the last 20 years, there are many challenges that face
               this discipline including indications for patient selection, minimizing immunosuppressive regimens,
               standardizing outcome measures, and establishing reliable protocols for monitoring, diagnosing, and
               managing rejection. The question remains if the risks associated with lifelong immunosuppression justify
               the non-lifesaving operation. Continued discussions of the advances, successes, and failures well determine
               how rapidly we are able to improve upon the aforementioned reconstructive options.


               DECLARATIONS
               Acknowledgments
               The Authors thank Hansjörg Wyss Foundation for their support.

               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contributions to conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: Azoury SC, Bauder A, Souza JM, Stranix JT, Othman S, McAndrew C, Tintle SM, Kovach SJ,
               Levin LS
               Performed data acquisition, provided administrative, technical, and material support: Azoury SC, Bauder A,
               Souza JM, Stranix JT, Othman S, McAndrew C, Tintle SM, Kovach SJ, Levin LS
               Reviewed the manuscript for content and grammar/spelling mistakes: Azoury SC, Bauder A, Souza JM,
               Stranix JT, Othman S, McAndrew C, Tintle SM, Kovach SJ, Levin LS


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Levin LS. The reconstructive ladder. An orthoplastic approach. Orthop Clin North Am 1993;24:393-409.
               2.   Azoury SC, Stranix JT, Kovach SJ, Levin LS. Principles of orthoplastic surgery for lower extremity reconstruction: why is this important?
                   J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; Epub ahead of print [PMID: 31454835 DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1695753]
               3.   Janis JE, Kwon RK, Attinger CE. The new reconstructive ladder: modifications to the traditional model. Plast Reconstr Surg
                   2011;127:205-12S.
               4.   Mathes SJ, Nahai F. Classification of the vascular anatomy of muscles: experimental and clinical correlation. Plast Reconstr Surg
                   1981;67:177-87.
               5.   Gottlieb LJ, Krieger LM. From the reconstructive ladder to the reconstructive elevator. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994;93:1503-4.
               6.   Wong CJ, Niranjan N. Reconstructive stages as an alternative to the reconstructive ladder. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:362-3e.
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55