Page 368 - Read Online
P. 368

Carter et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:33  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2020.81                                        Page 13 of 15

               Finally, our patients’ understanding of the day-by-day hospital course is greatly improved. Patients are
               given individualized treatments, especially when encountering complications, but our CPW allows patient,
               physician and nursing to be aligned as to each day’s expectations and treatments. Because of the predictable
               safety profile provided by our post phalloplasty CPW, most phalloplasty patients can be safely discharged 5
               days after the operation at our center.


               CONCLUSION
               We have described some of the more common postoperative complications and have summarized some
               of the established surgical techniques in the literature to date to address these complications. We have also
               described several more experimental techniques, many of which include promising new technology to
               further optimize the results of phalloplasty. Each of these techniques represents a modest but important
               improvement towards the goal of a safe and reproducible surgery with optimal results and minimized risk of
               complications.


               We and others endeavor to constantly evaluate and improve the steps of this surgery and investigate new
               concepts and materials in this field in an ongoing effort to further improve outcomes. We have had good
               success with these techniques at our high-volume center, although more thorough investigation and
               quantification of these patient outcomes is needed. Ultimately, with continued innovation and sharing of
               improved surgical techniques, it may be possible to better standardize care and improve the aesthetic and
               functional outcomes of this incredibly complex and increasingly common surgery.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Made substantial contribution to the conception and design of the study and performed data analysis and
               interpretation: Carter EE, Crane CN, Santucci RA


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               An informed consent to participate was obtained from the patients.


               Consent for publication
               A written informed consent for publication was obtained.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2020.

               REFERENCES

               1.   Frey JD, Poudrier G, Chiodo MV, Hazen A. An update on genital reconstruction options for the female-to-male transgender patient: a
                   review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;139:728-37.
               2.   Özer M, Pigot GLS, Bouman MB, van de Grift TC, Elfering L, et al. Development of a decision aid for genital gender-affirming surgery
                   in transmen. J Sex Med 2018;15:1041-8.
   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373