Page 140 - Read Online
P. 140

Page 14 of 18                              Stoneburner et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2020;7:13  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2019.028

               gracilis) through both end-to-end and end-to-side anastomoses to either anterior or posterior tibial vessels,
               consistent with the most frequently used surgical techniques. While two patients eventually underwent
               amputations, this adverse event was seen in only 1.4% of all extremities. Likewise, there was no statistically
               significant difference in rates of flap failure or amputation between the extremities that were managed
               according to the “fix and flap protocol” versus the placement of a flap before or after the frame. While the
               difference in outcomes between the most commonly used free flaps, the rectus abdominis and latissimus
               dorsi flaps, would be beneficial to evaluate, this was not possible given the nature of the studies. Nearly all
               of the case series that were included in our review reported multiple different types of flaps that were used
               in their patients, however the results were not separated according to flap type.


               Looking further into patient complications, the present study indicates that injuries managed in the acute
               setting were significantly more likely to undergo secondary surgical repair, compared to those who were
               chronic. While this may be due to more controlled surgical management of chronic wounds predating
               the beginning of the study time, the variability in injuries, patient morbidities, surgeon expertise, and
               postoperative care limits the value of this finding.


               An additional issue that can arise during the distraction process is the necessity to revise pin position or
               flap configuration. In cases of flap necrosis, however, distraction is often delayed or stopped altogether,
               necessitating additional procedures such as bone grafting [102] . Thus, meticulous planning of the flap in
               addition to careful postoperative care is crucial for successful reconstruction.

               Deciding the reconstructive method for soft tissue coverage can be challenging, as the options to choose
               from are vast. In the articles reviewed, free flaps and muscle flaps were more commonly utilized than
               rotational flaps and fasciocutaneous flaps, respectively. As for specific flaps, rectus abdominis flaps were
               used for the greatest number of extremities, whereas free latissimus dorsi flaps were cited in the greatest
               number of distinct articles. Microsurgical technique varied, with end-to-end anastomosis being used
               almost as often as end-to-side anastomosis. Recipient vessels were most commonly the anterior and
               posterior tibial arteries, although a diverse set of choices exist. Given the comparable success rates with all
               of these different techniques, flap choice is often left to the discretion of the surgeon.

               Aside from infection and fracture, the present review found that simultaneous placement of flap and frame,
               or the “fix and flap” protocol, had fewer reported adverse events overall [Figure 1]. These results align
               with the well-documented faster union times but differ from reported lower infection rates in the current
               literature [59,60] , given that our review actually found a higher rate of infection in the simultaneous placement
               of flap and frame. Two of the cases presented required additional surgeries, one for knee arthrofibrosis and
               foot deformity and the other for flap elevation, bone grafting, and docking.

               Other factors must be taken into consideration when attempting to mitigate the risk of flap loss, with one
                                                                 [62]
               of which being rate of bone transport. While Jupiter et al.  concluded that the free tissue and the native
               tissue undergo equal amounts of stretch and lengthening, Horas et al. [103]  noted a difference in speed
               between bone transport and soft-tissue movement, which could potentially jeopardize the vascular pedicle
               secondary. This risk increases with the amount of transport needed. Interestingly, all of the papers assessed
               in the review performed distraction at a rate between 0.75 and 1 mm per day, indicating that there is
               agreement that this range of rates produces optimal results.

               Although limb salvage and reconstruction through soft tissue coverage and distraction osteogenesis comes
               with substantial risk of complications and reoperations, outcomes remain strong. Over 98% of patients were
               ultimately weight bearing, and article authors on average reported rates of success and patient satisfaction
               as greater than 98%. All three of the case examples outlined in the present study are fully weight bearing as
               tolerated and working with physical therapy.
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145