Page 69 - Read Online
P. 69

Won et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2019;6:6  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2018.82                                             Page 15 of 16

               CONCLUSION
               The use of autogenous grafting material, especially the rib cartilage, is frequently needed when dealing
               with revision rhinoplasty cases associated with alloplast complications. Wise use of costal cartilage in
               revision rhinoplasty involves mastering intricacies that can decrease complications and improve results.
               Safe harvesting minimizing the complications, appropriate designing and carving to maximize the results
               and avoid warping, and appropriate postoperative care are all important. The rhinoplasty surgeon should
               be familiar with the common scenarios in which the rib cartilage is necessary as well as with the various
               technical aspects necessary to reduce complications.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Wrote the paper: Won TB, Jin HR

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               Both authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2019.



               REFERENCES
               1.   Won TB, Jin HR. Revision rhinoplasty in Asians. Ann Plast Surg 2010;65:379-84.
               2.   Toriumi DM, Swartout B. Asian rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2007;15:293-307.
               3.   Jin HR, Won TB. Nasal hump removal in Asians. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2007;558:95-101.
               4.   Jin HR, Won TB. Nasal tip augmentation in Asians using autogenous cartilage. Otolarygol Head Neck Surg 2009;140:526-30.
               5.   Won TB, Jin HR. Nuances with the Asian tip. Facial Plast Surg 2012;28:187-93.
               6.   Jin HR, Won TB. Recent advances in Asian rhinoplasty. Auris Nasus Larynx 2011;38:157-64.
               7.   Jin HR, Won TB. Rhinoplasty in the Asian Patient. Clin Plast Surg 2016;43:265-79.
               8.   Zeng Y, Wu W, Yu H, Yang J, Chen G, et al. Silicone implant in augmentation rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 2002;49:495-9.
               9.   Ahn JM, Honrado C, Horn C. Combined silicone and cartilage implants: augmentation rhinoplasty in Asian patients. Arch Facial Plast
                   Surg 2004;6:120-3.
               10.  Deva  AK,  Merten S, Chang L. Silicone in nasal augmentation  rhinoplasty: a decade of clinical  experience.  Plast Reconstr Surg
                   1998;102:1230-7.
               11.  Tham C, Lai YL, Weng CJ, Chen YR. Silicone augmentation rhinoplasty in an Oriental population. Ann Plast Surg 2005;54:1-5.
               12.  Endo T, Nakayama Y, Ito Y. Augmentation rhinoplasty: observations on 1,200 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;87:54-9.
               13.  Mendelsohn M, Dunlop G. Gore-Tex augmentation grafting in rhinoplasty-is it safe? J Otolaryngol 1998;27:337-41.
               14.  Rothstein SG, Jacobs JB. The use of Gore-Tex implants in nasal augmentation operations. Entechnology 1989;68:40-5.
               15.  Jin HR, Lee JY, Yeon JY, Rhee CS. A multicenter evaluation of the safety of Gore-Tex as an implant in Asian rhinoplasty. Am J Rhinol
                   2006;20:615-9.
               16.  Jung DH, Moon HJ, Choi SH, Lam SM. Secondary rhinoplasty of the Asian nose: correction of the contracted nose. Aesthetic Plast Surg
                   2004;28:1-7.
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74