Page 28 - Read Online
P. 28

Azadgoli et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2018;5:3  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2017.32                                        Page 5 of 12

                Zaretski et al. [33]    2004       Femur                      Free vascularized fibula flap ± allograft
                                                   Tibia                      Free double-barreled fibula
                Capanna et al. [34]     1993       Femur                      Free vascularized fibula flap + allograft
                                                   Tibia
                Beris et al. [35]       2011       Femur                      Free vascularized fibula ± allograft
                                                   Tibia                      Free double-barreled fibula
                Yajima and Tamai [36]   1994       Femur                      Twin-barrelled vascularized fibular graft
                                                   Tibia
                                                   Ankle
                Duffy et al. [37]       2000       Femur                      Free vascularized fibula
                                                   Tibia
                Rush and Koman [38]     1997       Tibia                      Fibula-flexor halluces longus osteomuscular
                                                                              flap
                Mastorakos et al. [39]  2002       Tibia                      LD
                                                                              RA
                                                                              Gastrocnemius-Soleus
                                                                              Gastrocnemius-RA
                Doi et al. [41]         1998       Lower leg                  Gracilis + motor nerve
                Doi et al. [42]         1999       Thigh                      LD + motor nerve
                                                   Lower leg                  Gracilis + motor nerve
               LD: latissimus dorsi; RA: rectus abdominis; ALT: anterior lateral thigh

               free latissimus dorsi flaps, while the remaining patients received pedicled flaps. In the patients who were
               reconstructed using free flaps, the only complications were leg edema and mild lymphedema, which the
               authors attributed to ischemic reperfusion or venous/lymphatic insufficiency. The use of a myocutaneous
               flap in combination with an autologous vein graft also results in decreased postoperative infection rates,
                                                                          [14]
               treatment of lymphedema and fistula, and increased graft patency rates .
               Aesthetically, reconstruction of the thigh requires a large flap with muscle bulk that can eliminate dead
                                                 [10]
               space while providing adequate contour . The use of a free rectus abdominis flap has been reported to be
               particularly successful for this purpose [6,10] . The latissimus dorsi flap, which is thin, large with a long vascular
               pedicle, ± neurotization has also been used for large defects of the thigh [6,10] . The use of the anterior lateral
                                                                                                [15]
               thigh (ALT) flap for large thigh defects, particularly of the posterior thigh, has also been reported .
               Knee
               Obtaining adequate soft tissue coverage of the knee remains challenging for many plastic surgeons, not
               only because of the biomechanics of the knee, but also due to exposure of vital structures as well as the joint
               space [16-18] . Rotational muscle flaps or myocutaneous flaps such as gastrocnemius or reverse anterior lateral
               thigh flaps have been the mainstay for the reconstruction of tumors in this location. These flaps usually
               have low donor - site morbidity. However more complex defects may require the use of free tissue transfer.
               In these cases the deep-seated recipient popliteal vessels of the knee can make microvascular anastomosis
                      [19]
               difficult , an autologous vein graft loop can be used and the distal SFA and SFV can be used as recipient
                                                                 [14]
               vessels if there is an extended field of neoadjuvant radiation .
               Multiple donor sites have been successful used in free flap coverage of knee defects. These include latissimus
                                                  [6]
               dorsi, rectus abdominis, and scapula flaps . When there is a large contour defect in the popliteal fossa that
                                                                    [10]
               does not require much filling of the muscular space, Leow et al.  have also described the use of a free mini-
               transverse rectus abdominis (TRAM) myocutaneous flap.
               In many cases where complex reconstruction of the knee region is needed, salvage of the popliteal
               artery, which can often be involved in the disease process, becomes critical. This has traditionally been
                                                                                                       [20]
               accomplished using a combination of a local gastrocnemius flap with an interpositional vein graft .
                                      [21]
               However, Miyamoto et al.  described two cases of successful one-stage reconstruction of complex knee
               defects including the popliteal artery using a free flow-through ALT flap. Although the use of a deep
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33