Page 87 - Read Online
P. 87

Page 4 of 7              Guerra et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2022;9:42  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2021.136

               Table 1. Comparison of success rates for different techniques
                            Number of            Mean length            F/U   Success rate   Time to recurrence
                Source                    Location          Intervention
                            patients             (cm)                   (yr)  (%)         (mo)
                      [23]
                Ahyai et al.     35       B & BM  2.9       BMGU        2.2   71.1        17
                (2015)
                       [22]
                Rourke et al.     72      BM     2.1        EPA (65%)   4     91          29.8
                (2016)
                                                 6.1        Graft/Flap        75
                                                            (35%)
                      [20]
                Hofer et al.     38       B & BM  2.4       EPA (92%)   3.5   69.7        10.1
                (2014)
                                                 4.25       Graft/Flap (8%) 5.5  85       7
               B: Bulbar; BM: bulbomembranous; EPA: excision and primary anastomosis; BMGU: buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty; F/U: follow up.

                                                                                                [21]
               in some cases, a cystoscopy control for stricture recurrence based on the evolution of the patient .
               In the study by Hofer et al. (2014) of the 72 men with radiation-induced urethral strictures, 66 (91.7%)
               underwent urethroplasty with EPA and the remaining 6 (8.3%) underwent substitution urethroplasty using
               a graft or flap . The reconstruction was eventually successful in 46 (69.7%) men. Time to reappearance was
                          [20]
               observed to be 10.2 months and was associated with stricture length greater than 2 cm (P = 0.013). RT type
               did not have a significant impact on risk. In general, EPA is a successful technique for bulbomembranous
               urethra in patients with RT strictures [21,22] .

               Rourke et al. (2016) retrospectively reviewed outcomes in 35 patients with bulbomembranous stenosis for
                                         [22]
               RT undergoing urethroplasty . Of these, 20 had undergone EBRT and 15 BT, presenting with RT-
               associated stenosis with an average stricture length of 3.5 cm. Almost half of the patients enrolled before the
               urethroplasty with an indwelling suprapubic catheter as the baseline. The anastomotic repair was performed
               in 23 patients (65.7%); 12 patients required intraoperative tissue transfers, with either buccal mucosa graft
               (20.0%) or penile island flap (14.3%). Urethral patency was achieved in 30 patients (85.7%) and confirmed
               with cystoscopy; no significant difference was observed between the operative techniques. However, 31.4%
               of patients experienced a complication, but all of these complications, reported within 90 days, were Clavien
               Grades I-II .
                        [22]
               Short-term complications, which include wound and urinary tract infections, occur infrequently and are
               usually managed easily. Problems with chordee and erectile dysfunction are uncommon.

               Substitution urethroplasty
               When EPA is not possible for urethral stricture, substitution urethroplasty has become the key treatment,
               especially with BMG. As for the benefits of BMG, it shows decreased propensity for contraction, its lamina
               propria is thin with excellent vascularization, it has not been exposed to irradiation, and it has excellent
                                                                                      [23]
               elasticity, which allows it to be easily adapted according to the recipient bed shape . Long strictures have
               been found difficult to treat, especially in the irradiated urethras. It is important to fix the graft to a well-
               vascularized field when performing urethroplasty with dorsal or ventral onlay approaches. Furthermore, a
               previously irradiated urethra is often poorly vascularized, thereby impeding wound healing [23,24] . There is
               currently insufficient evidence regarding ventral onlay BMG and dorsal urethroplasty for the treatment of
               urethral strictures.


               The corpus spongiosum is necessary for the survival of the ventral onlay BMG graft. The most important
               benefits of the ventral approach are that the urethra, especially proximal, is easier to reach, exposure of the
               narrow segment is better facilitating evaluation and graft placement, and mobilization of the bulbar urethra
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92