Page 97 - Read Online
P. 97

Gossett et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2021;8:60                                  Plastic and
               DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2021.69
                                                                                Aesthetic Research




               Review                                                                        Open Access



               Innervation options for gracilis free muscle transfer
               in facial reanimation


                                          2
                               1
               Katherine Gossett , David Chen , Myriam Loyo 3
               1
                Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
               2
                Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of
               Arizona, Tuscon, AZ 85724, USA.
               3
                Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health &
               Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
               Correspondence to: Dr. David Chen, Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology - Head
               and Neck Surgery, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Tuscon, AZ 85724, USA. E-mail: chenda@musc.edu
               How to cite this article: Gossett K, Chen D, Loyo M. Innervation options for gracilis free muscle transfer in facial reanimation.
               Plast Aesthet Res 2021;8:60. https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2021.69

               Received: 18 Jun 2021  First Decision: 20 Aug 2021  Revised: 11 Sep 2021  Accepted: 20 Oct 2021  Published: 5 Nov 2021

               Academic Editors: Mark K. Wax, Ruben Yap Kannan  Copy Editor: Xi-Jun Chen  Production Editor: Xi-Jun Chen

               Abstract
               Gracilis free muscle transfer (GFMT) is considered the gold standard in dynamic smile reanimation in patients with
               long-standing facial paralysis. There are multiple motor nerves in the head and neck that can be used to provide
               innervation to the GFMT, either alone or in combination. In this article, we review the literature about these donor
               nerve options and discuss their advantages and disadvantages in terms of smile excursion, spontaneity, reliability,
               and timing. Furthermore, we discuss the use of multiple donor nerve sources in dually-innervated GFMT and areas
               for future investigation.

               Keywords: Facial paralysis, facial reanimation, gracilis free muscle transfer, masseteric nerve, cross facial nerve
               graft



               INTRODUCTION
               Facial paralysis is a devastating condition that can lead to significant psychological distress and functional
                                     [1]
               and aesthetic impairment . The management of facial paralysis focuses on restoring symmetry to the face at
               rest and with facial expressions. In the lower face, smile restoration is a key element of dynamic facial






                           © The Author(s) 2021. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, sharing,
                           adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as
               long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and
               indicate if changes were made.

                                                                                            www.parjournal.net
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102