Page 47 - Read Online
P. 47

Krauss et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2018;5:39  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2018.41                                           Page 3 of 10

                                            Table 1. Different ways of tissue conditioning
                                            Tissue conditioning
                                            Surgical delay
                                            Ischemic preconditioning
                                            Remote ischemic preconditioning
                                            Thermic preconditioning
                                            Growth factors
                                            Extracorporeal shock waves
                                            Stemm cells
                                            Pharmaceutical preconditioning


               Surgical delay
               Surgical delay is the predecessor of modern preconditioning techniques. By raising the flap itself without
               severing its pedicle, the vessels along the axis of the flap reorganize and increase in size, leading to a better
               perfusion of the distal flap due to a dilation of linking and choke vessels, causing a connection of adjacent
               vascular territories which could be demonstrated in animal models as well as in humans [31,32] . Direct linking
               vessels have a large caliber and connect adjacent vascular territories by connecting perforators themselves,
               while indirect linking vessels, also known as choke vessels, connect vascular territories via recurrent flow
               through the subdermal plexus [33,34] . The mechanisms behind this are still not fully understood but there are
               many animal studies that could show neovascularisation, vasodilation and reorganization of vessels due to
               surgical delay [35-37] . Although surgical delay proved to increase flap perfusion and therefore increased the
               survival of flaps in the clinical setting [38,39] , there are also major disadvantages to this strategy, especially the
               need for additional surgery and its risks for the affected patients as well as increased health care costs due
               to longer hospital stays. Especially in TRAM flaps surgical delay was used but due to the improvement of
               microsurgical methods free flaps as the DIEP flap have become a safer and more often applied alternative with
               less donor side morbidity [40-42] .


               Ischemic preconditioning
                                                                  [43]
               Ischemic preconditioning was introduced by Mounsey et al.  for conditioning of the myocardium, but has
               since been applied to different fields of surgery including flap surgery. Murry et al.  and Jennings et al. [45]
                                                                                      [44]
               found that brief, intermittent cycles of ischemia have a protective effect on the myocardium resulting in a
               delay or even protection of lethal injury to the myocardial cells due to metabolic changes in the affected
               cells in a dog model. Various animal studies showed, that ischemic preconditioning leads to an increase
               in capillary perfusion, the vascular response to changes in perfusion pressure, a decrease in leukocyte-
               mediated reperfusion injury, an increase of critical ischemia time tolerated by the affected tissue, a decrease
               of vasospasms as well as a decrease in the capillary no-reflow phenomenon [46-49] . All of these mechanisms lead
                                                                                  [48]
               to a significant decrease in flap necrosis in skin flaps as well as in muscle flaps . Because of these positive
               effects, the ideal application of ischemic preconditioning was examined as well. It was found that three cycles
               of ischemic preconditioning of 10 min each are superior to the application of only one or two cycles. They also
               found that a cycle of 10 min of ischemia is superior to 5 min of ischemia . It could also be shown that there is
                                                                          [50]
               no difference in the positive effect of ischemic preconditioning on reducing muscle flap necrosis whether it is
                                                        [51]
               applied 24 h or immediately before flap elevation . Interestingly, ischemic preconditioning has immediate as
               well as late protective effects: the immediate effect is an improvement of the blood flow hemodynamics and an
               attenuation of the leukocyte-mediated reperfusion injury whereas after 24 h of reperfusion the improvement
                                                                                                       [46]
               of the hemodynamics has subsided while the protective effect against reperfusion injury was still present .
               Although there are those numerous positive effects of ischemic preconditioning it hasn’t found its way into
               clinical routine use. The main reason for this might be the additional time needed for preparing the pedicle
               and applying ischemia prior to flap elevation as well as the spreading of new techniques like indocyanine
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52