Page 56 - Read Online
P. 56

Sjöberg et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2024;11:55  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2024.86  Page 5 of 7

               obstacles, potentially broadening the usage of dermal grafting techniques.


               Initial experiments with this device [Figure 1] (Patent, Reg. 2050787-7 and 21739981.5) on four human
               cadavers demonstrated its capability to produce at least two distinct grafts with predetermined thicknesses,
               simplifying what has typically been a complex and demanding surgical task. The thickness of the dermal
               graft can be adjusted within the desired range by modifying the opening at the second cutting blade. As
               shown in the paper, this adjustment enables the production of dermal grafts with thicknesses ranging from
               200 to 1,000 µm. At the microscopic level, the uniformity of both the upper and lower grafts confirmed the
               precision of the dermatome, and the ease of use was documented in parallel and thus supported its future
               potential. This proof-of-concept study highlights the multiblade dermatome’s feasibility in producing dual
               grafts, suggesting a future where dermal grafting could be more accessible and practical in clinical
                      [15]
               settings .
               Preliminary results utilizing this new device are promising. The multiblade dermatome allows for more
               precise and consistent cuts, significantly reducing the technical difficulty of the procedure. This innovation
               not only simplifies the harvesting process but also enhances the quality of the dermal grafts obtained,
               leading to better integration and healing at the recipient site.


               FUTURE WORK
               One challenge that needs further exploration is the expansion level of the DG and its relationship with the
               healing process. Another topic of interest is the choice of thickness for the DG component, where two issues
               evolve. Firstly, there is a need for a thicker dermal component in the reconstruction of areas with restrictive
               scars or contractures. Secondly, the multiblade dermatome can be adjusted to take different thicknesses of
               the graft, and the choice of thickness needs to be explored, also from the point of creating a full-thickness
               skin defect. The variability of the dermal component thickness needs to be included in the decision process,
               as different body areas, such as the back, limb, and sole, provide dermal areas with varying thicknesses.
               Additionally, the value of generating more than two strips with a multiblade dermatome needs to be further
               explored.


               Future work will also focus on further refining the multiblade dermatome to optimize its performance and
               ease of use. Additionally, clinical trials are needed to validate the long-term benefits of using this device in
               various reconstructive procedures. Researchers are also exploring the potential for combining the
               multiblade dermatome with other advanced technologies, such as tissue engineering, to further enhance the
               precision and efficiency of dermal grafting. These efforts aim to make dermal grafting more accessible and
               practical for a wider range of clinical applications, ultimately improving patient outcomes in plastic and
               reconstructive surgery.


               SUMMARY
               The review traces the historical development of skin grafting, leading to the introduction of dermal grafting
               in the early 21st century as a novel approach to overcome the limitations of conventional techniques. Four
               main advantages of dermal grafting are highlighted:

               Accelerated healing at donor sites compared to conventional split-thickness grafts.


               Improved aesthetic outcomes due to the elastic nature of dermal grafts, enabling application without
               meshing for a smoother appearance.
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61