Page 85 - Read Online
P. 85

Haddock et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2024;11:47  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2024.60  Page 12 of  12

                   PubMed
               35.      Mericli AF, McHugh T, Kruse B, DeSnyde SM, Rebello E, Offodile AC. Time-driven activity-based costing to model cost utility of
                   enhanced recovery after surgery pathways in microvascular breast reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg 2020;230:784-794.e3.  DOI
                   PubMed
               36.      Sharma HR, Rozen WM, Mathur B, Ramakrishnan V. 100 steps of a DIEP flap—a prospective comparative cohort series
                   demonstrating the successful implementation of process mapping in microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019;7:e2016.  DOI
                   PubMed  PMC
               37.      Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Deconstructing the reconstruction: evaluation of process and efficiency in deep inferior epigastric perforator
                   flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;145:717e-724e.  DOI  PubMed
               38.      Lee BT, Tobias AM, Yueh JH, et al. Design and impact of an intraoperative pathway: a new operating room model for team-based
                   practice. J Am Coll Surg 2008;207:865-873.  DOI  PubMed
               39.      Todd AR, Genereux O, Schrag C, Hatchell A, Matthews J. Improved operative efficiency and surgical times in autologous breast
                   reconstruction: a 15-year single-center retrospective review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023;11:e5231.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               40.      Wade RG, Watford J, Wormald JCR, Bramhall RJ, Figus A. Perforator mapping reduces the operative time of DIEP flap breast
                   reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance
                   angiography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2018;71:468-477.  DOI  PubMed
               41.      Vasile JV, Levine JL. Magnetic resonance angiography in perforator flap breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2016;5:197-211.  DOI
                   PubMed  PMC
               42.      Thiessen FEF, Tondu T, Cloostermans B, et al. Dynamic InfraRed thermography (DIRT) in DIEP-Flap breast reconstruction: a review
                   of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019;242:47-55.  DOI  PubMed
               43.      Speck NE, Dreier K, Fluetsch A, Babst D, Lardi AM, Farhadi J. Comparing complications and perioperative teams in microsurgical
                   breast reconstruction: retrospective cohort study. Gland Surg 2022;11:1754-1763.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               44.      Cevik J, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM. The importance of perioperative team familiarity and its contribution to surgical efficiency and
                   outcomes in microsurgical breast reconstruction. Gland Surg 2023;12:1-4.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               45.      Bauermeister AJ, Zuriarrain A, Newman M, Earle SA, Medina MA. Impact of continuous two-team approach in autologous breast
                   reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2017;33:298-304.  DOI  PubMed
               46.      Weichman KE, Lam G, Wilson SC, et al. The impact of two operating surgeons on microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr
                   Surg 2017;139:277-284.  DOI  PubMed
               47.      Haddock NT, Kayfan S, Pezeshk RA, Teotia SS. Co-surgeons in breast reconstructive microsurgery: what do they bring to the table?
                   Microsurgery 2018;38:14-20.  DOI  PubMed
               48.      Mericli AF, Chu CK, Sisk GC, et al. Microvascular breast reconstruction in the era of value-based care: use of a cosurgeon is
                   associated with reduced costs, improved outcomes, and added value. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022;149:338-348.  DOI  PubMed
               49.      Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Five steps to internal mammary vessel preparation in less than 15 minutes. Plast Reconstr Surg
                   2017;140:884-886.  DOI  PubMed
               50.      Malagón-López P, Vilà J, Carrasco-López C, et al. Intraoperative indocyanine green angiography for fat necrosis reduction in the deep
                   inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap. Aesthet Surg J 2019;39:NP45-NP54.  DOI  PubMed
               51.      Malagón-López P, Carrasco-López C, García-Senosiain O, Vilà J, Del-Río M, Priego D, Julian-Ibáñez JF, Higueras-Suñe C. When to
                   assess the DIEP flap perfusion by intraoperative indocyanine green angiography in breast reconstruction? Breast 2019;47:102-108.
                   DOI  PubMed
               52.      Ludolph I, Bettray D, Beier JP, Horch RE, Arkudas A. Leaving the perfusion zones? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2022;75:52-60.
                   DOI  PubMed
               53.      Hembd AS, Yan J, Zhu H, Haddock NT, Teotia SS. Intraoperative assessment of DIEP flap breast reconstruction using indocyanine
                   green angiography: reduction of fat necrosis, resection volumes, and postoperative surveillance. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;146:1e-10e.
                   DOI  PubMed
               54.      Martinez CA, Boutros SG. Outpatient microsurgical breast reconstruction. last Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020;8:e3109.  DOI
                   PubMed  PMC
               55.      Martinez CA, Reis SM, Rednam R, Boutros SG. The outpatient diep: safety and viability following a modified recovery protocol. Plast
                   Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018;6:e1898.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               56.      Tapp MW, Duet ML, Steele TN, et al. Postoperative day 1 discharge in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast
                   reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2023;11:e5064.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               57.      Haddock NT, Garza R, Boyle CE, Liu Y, Teotia SS. Defining enhanced recovery pathway with or without liposomal bupivacaine in
                   diep flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;148:948-957.  DOI  PubMed
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90