Page 77 - Read Online
P. 77

Haddock et al. Plast Aesthet Res 2024;11:47  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-9264.2024.60  Page 5 of 12



























                Figure 1. Mapping diagram of a delayed bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction in a 58-year-old patient with a BMI of 25.6. The first
                DIEP flap had one intermediate perforator and the second DIEP flap had three lateral perforators. There were no revisions. The
                procedure was completed in 3 h and 25 min. De-ep: De-epithelialization; TAP: transversus abdominus plane; DIEP: deep inferior
                epigastric perforator flap.

               (breast AND reconstruction) AND (microsurgery OR free flap OR autologous) AND (efficiency OR process
               analysis OR lean OR six sigma OR four discipline). Data items extracted included: year, authors, country,
               study size, duration, strategy implemented, main aims, area of application, study design and methodology,
               outcomes, relevant statistical analysis, and follow-up.

               Screening was performed at two levels (title/abstract and full text screening) by two independent reviewers
               (T. S. and N. H.). The initial criteria for full text screening included articles describing the implementation
               of efficiency models in microvascular breast reconstruction. Studies were excluded if they were not available
               in the English language, animal or cadaveric studies, studies published before the year 2004, publications
               formatted as a letter, editorial, or conference abstract, those that did not list a process or depicted the
               process as a map, or did not have a novel process-mapping for the selected center(s). Due to the lack of
               randomized control trials and a diverse range of study aims and outcomes, meta-analysis was not
               applicable.

               RESULTS
               A total of 256 records were identified through the literature search [Figure 2]. After removing duplicates
               and screening titles/abstracts, 29 full-text publications were reviewed. Eleven articles met all inclusion
               criteria [Table 1]. Six were retrospective reviews and five were prospective cohort studies. Six articles
               centered around the standardization of operative technique without a predefined “model of efficiency”,
               whereas five articles highlighted a specific implementation protocol of an efficiency model. Of these five,
               one used a Lean Six Sigma model, one used a 4DX model, and three used a process mapping and analysis
               model.


               DISCUSSION
               Microvascular breast reconstruction represents a sophisticated, multi-stage procedure necessitating the
               collaboration of a sizable surgical team. The degree of complexity inherent in the process, as well as the
               involvement of numerous personnel, underscores the potential benefits of employing process analysis for
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82