Page 76 - Read Online
P. 76

Merritt et al. Neuroimmunol Neuroinflammation 2019;6:9  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2347-8659.2019.15                  Page 9 of 11

               Condition’s such as UTI, sepsis, and pressure ulcers account for higher health care cost utilization by
               TSCI patients. Reduction of secondary heath conditions is one of the few areas that can be modified
               in TSCI patients. Implementing rehabilitation and education about secondary health conditions for all
               TSCI patients would save both hospitals and patients money. These savings would allow for allocation of
               healthcare resources to other areas.



               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Conceptualized the theme and conducted the literature review process: Merritt CH, Taylor MA, Yelton CJ
               Contributed to preparation of the manuscript, interpretation of subtopics, preparation figures, and revision
               of the manuscript; and approved the final version to be published: Merritt CH, Taylor MA, Yelton CJ, Ray
               SK


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               The work was supported in part by an investigator-initiated research grant (SCIRF-2015-I-01) from South
               Carolina Spinal Cord Injury Research Fund (Columbia, SC, USA), and earlier R01 grants (CA-091460; NS-
               057811) from the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD, USA).

               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2019.


               REFERENCES
               1.   James SL, Theadom A, Ellenbogen RG, Bannick MS, Montjoy-Venning W, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic
                   brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol
                   2019;18:56-87.
               2.   National Spinal Cord InjuryStatistical Center. Spinal Cord Injury Facts and Figures at a Glance. J Spinal Cord Med 2013;36:568-9.
               3.   Jain NB, Ayers GD, Peterson EN, Harris MB, Morse L, et al. Traumatic spinal cord injury in the United States, 1993-2012. JAMA
                   2015;313:2236-43.
               4.   Ge L, Arul K, Ikpeze T, Baldwin A, Nickels JL, et al. Traumatic and Nontraumatic Spinal Cord Injuries. World Neurosurg
                   2018;111:e142-8.
               5.   Devivo MJ. Epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury: Trends and future implications. Spinal Cord 2012;50:365-72.
               6.   Frontera JE, Mollett P. Aging with Spinal Cord Injury: An Update. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2017;28:821-8.
               7.   Kirshblum S, Waring W. Updates for the international standards for neurological classification of Spinal Cord Injury. Phys Med
                   Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014;25:505-17.
               8.   Smith EM, Boucher N, Miller WC. Caregiving services in spinal cord injury: A systematic review of the literature. Spinal Cord
                   2016;54:562-9.
               9.   Ma VY, Chan L, Carruthers KJ. Incidence, prevalence, costs, and impact on disability of common conditions requiring rehabilitation
                   in the united states: Stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, limb loss,
                   and back pa. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014;95:986-95.
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81