Page 114 - Read Online
P. 114

Author Instructions

            Research Highlight  A Research Highlight article is peer-  1200  None required.  3-8   /
                            reviewed paper and highlights work   max              keywords
                            recently published in the journal or in a
                            recent issue of another journal.

            Short           Short Communications are short papers 2500  Unstructured abstract.  3-8   /
            Communication   that present original and significant   max  No more than 250   keywords
                            material for rapid dissemination. Short   words.
                            articles include, but are not limited
                            to: discovery or development of new
                            materials, cutting-edge experiments
                            and theory, novelty in simulation and
                            modeling, elucidation of mechanisms.


           2.3 Manuscript Structure
           2.3.1 Front Matter
           2.3.1.1 Title
           The title of the manuscript should be concise, specific and relevant, with no more than 16 words if possible. When gene or
           protein names are included, the abbreviated name rather than full name should be used.

           2.3.1.2 Authors and Affiliations
           Authors’ full names should be listed. The initials of middle names can be provided. Institutional addresses and email
           addresses for all authors should be listed. At least one author should be designated as corresponding author. In addition,
           corresponding authors are suggested to provide their Open Researcher and Contributor ID upon submission. Please note
           that any change to authorship is not allowed after manuscript acceptance.

           2.3.1.3 Abstract
           Original research, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses require structured abstracts. The abstract should provide the
           context or background for the study and should state the study’s purpose, basic procedures (selection of study participants,
           settings, measurements, analytical methods), main findings (giving specific effect sizes and their statistical and clinical
           significance,  if  possible),  and  principal  conclusions.  It  should  emphasize  new  and  important  aspects  of  the  study  or
           observations, note important limitations, and not overinterpret findings. Clinical trial abstracts should include items that the
           CONSORT group has identified as essential. It is not allowed to contain results which are not presented and substantiated in
           the manuscript, or exaggerate the main conclusions. Citations should not be included in the abstract.

           2.3.1.4 Keywords
           Three to eight keywords should be provided, which are specific to the article, yet reasonably common within the subject
           discipline.

           2.3.2 Main Text
           Manuscripts of different types are structured with different sections of content. Please refer to Types of Manuscripts to
           make sure which sections should be included in the manuscripts.
           2.3.2.1 Introduction
           Provide a context or background for the study (that is, the nature of the problem and its significance). State the specific
           purpose or research objective of, or hypothesis tested by, the study or observation. Cite only directly pertinent references,
           and do not include data or conclusions from the work being reported.
           2.3.2.2 Methods
           The guiding principle of the Methods section should be clarity about how and why a study was done in a particular way. The
           Methods section should aim to be sufficiently detailed such that others with access to the data would be able to reproduce
 V         the results. In general, the section should include only information that was available at the time the plan or protocol for
           the study was being written; all information obtained during the study belongs in the Results section. If an organization
           was paid or otherwise contracted to help conduct the research (examples include data collection and management), then
           this should be detailed in the methods. The Methods section should include a statement indicating that the research was
           approved by an independent local, regional or national review body (e.g., ethics committee, institutional review board). If
           doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, the authors must explain
           the rationale for their approach and demonstrate that the local, regional or national review body explicitly approved the
           doubtful aspects of the study.

           2.3.2.2.1 Selection and Description of Participants
           Clearly describe the selection of observational or experimental participants (healthy individuals or patients, including


            VI                                                                 Metabolism and Target Organ Damage
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119