Page 39 - Read Online
P. 39

Klaassens et al. Microbiome Res Rep 2024;3:38  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2024.13  Page 5 of 19

               fecal samples were defrosted and immediately added to the reactors. At the start of the short-term colonic
               incubation, the test ingredients (pre-digested infant formulae and probiotic strains) were added to sugar-
               depleted buffered nutritional medium containing basal nutrients present in the colon. Probiotic strains were
                                              7
               added in a concentration of 1.5 × 10  CFU/mL each. Finally, the cryopreserved fecal suspensions of each of
               the donors were added [10% (v:v)]. Control experiments had no probiotic addition (Blank). Reactors were
               incubated for 48 h at 37 °C under continuous shaking (90 rpm) and anaerobic conditions. The incubations
               were performed in fully independent reactors with sufficiently high volume (70 mL) in order to not only
               ensure robust microbial fermentation, but also enable the collection of multiple samples over time. Samples
               were collected for metagenome sequencing and the metagenome data were used to investigate the
               taxonomic profiles at the species and strain levels. DNA extraction was carried out in accordance with the
                                                                                                       [26]
               methodology outlined in Duysburgh et al. , which was based on the approach proposed by Boon et al. .
                                                   [25]
               DNA QC quantitation was performed with Quant-iT  dsDNA Broad-Range Assay Kit (Invitrogen) and
                                                             TM
               agarose gel electrophoresis for DNA integrity.
               Metagenome sequencing of the microbiome
               DNA samples were subject to Illumina Nextera XT library preparation. The sequencing libraries obtained,
               with an insert size of at least 300 bp, were sequenced on a NovaSeq 6000 instrument with paired-end 150 nt
               sequencing protocol on 1 S1 flowcell. Demultiplexed reads were trimmed and subsampled to 1,200 MB.
               FASTQ read sequence files were generated using bcl2fastq2 version 2.18, which includes Illumina Chastity
               quality filtering with default settings. Subsequently, reads containing PhiX control signal were removed
               using Bowtie 2.2.6. In addition, reads containing (partial) adapters were clipped (up to a minimum read
               length of 50 bp) with ea-utils 1.0.4. The second quality assessment was based on the remaining reads using
               the FASTQC quality control tool version 0.11.8. The resulting FASTQ files were used as input for
               taxonomic profiling as described below, using an internal infant-specific reference database V1 as a
               secondary input. The whole genome sequences (WGS) of both probiotics (Bb and Lf) were added to this
               database for strain tracking purposes.

               Specific database for taxonomic profiling of metagenome data to strain level in infant-specific
               intestinal ecosystems
               To increase the resolution of taxonomic classification, a specific metagenome database was built with
               genome assemblies targeted toward the infant gut microbiome. This database was used in a Kraken-
               Bracken-based assembly-free taxonomic profiling workflow . Compiling the database, a literature search
                                                                  [27]
               was performed to create a list of bacterial genera that are commonly found in the infant gut (09-Dec-2021).
               We created this list at the family level to ensure the inclusion of all closely related genera. All publicly
               available genomes belonging to these families were collected by search in Refseq , GenBank , ENA , and
                                                                                             [29]
                                                                                  [28]
                                                                                                    [30]
                    [31]
               DDBJ  databases. Only complete and scaffold level assemblies were used, since contig level assemblies are
               usually  too  small  and  low-quality  to  add  to  the  database.  The  following  genomes  were  added

               to the Refseq database: 18,224 genomes of t h e   Pasteurellales, Bacteroidales, Clostridiales, Enterobacterales,
               Selenomonadales, and Verrucomicrobiales orders, 951 genomes from a recently published human (adult) gut
               microbiome catalog , 2,132 genomes belonging to the archaeal phyla Crenarchaeota, Euryarchaeota, and
                                [32]
               Thaumarchaeota [33,34] , 5,252 Eukaryotic genomes, namely the Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Glomeromycotina,
               and Mucoromycota , and viral genomes from the Human Reference Genome (GRCh38.p13) to filter out
                               [35]
               reads belonging to the human genome, and a list of common vectors (UniCoreVec). After combining all
               these genomes, any potential duplicates remaining were removed. Genomes of low quality or too short
               scaffolding length were removed as well. This resulted in a database with a total of 73,085 complete and
               scaffold-level genomes relevant to the infant gut microbiome. The genome assemblies of probiotic strains
               used in this study were added to this database, enabling us to trace them in our experimental samples.
   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44