Page 52 - Read Online
P. 52

Wang et al. Microbiome Res Rep 2024;3:39  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/mrr.2024.21  Page 17 of 17

               28.      Su M, Ling Y, Yu J, Wu J, Xiao J. Small proteins: untapped area of potential biological importance. Front Genet 2013;4:286.  DOI
                   PubMed  PMC
               29.      Leary DH, Hervey WJ 4th, Deschamps JR, Kusterbeck AW, Vora GJ. Which metaproteome? The impact of protein extraction bias on
                   metaproteomic analyses. Mol Cell Probes 2013;27:193-9.  DOI  PubMed
               30.      Tanca A, Palomba A, Pisanu S, Addis MF, Uzzau S. Enrichment or depletion? The impact of stool pretreatment on metaproteomic
                   characterization of the human gut microbiota. Proteomics 2015;15:3474-85.  DOI  PubMed
               31.      Blackburn JM, Martens L. The challenge of metaproteomic analysis in human samples. Expert Rev Proteomics 2016;13:135-8.  DOI
                   PubMed
               32.      Zhang X, Li L, Mayne J, Ning Z, Stintzi A, Figeys D. Assessing the impact of protein extraction methods for human gut
                   metaproteomics. J Proteomics 2018;180:120-7.  DOI  PubMed
               33.      Xiao L, Feng Q, Liang S, et al. A catalog of the mouse gut metagenome. Nat Biotechnol 2015;33:1103-8.  DOI  PubMed
               34.      Chi H, Liu C, Yang H, et al. Comprehensive identification of peptides in tandem mass spectra using an efficient open search engine.
                   Nat Biotechnol 2018;36:1059-61.  DOI  PubMed
               35.      Kong AT, Leprevost FV, Avtonomov DM, Mellacheruvu D, Nesvizhskii AI. MSFragger: ultrafast and comprehensive peptide
                   identification in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Methods 2017;14:513-20.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               36.      Cheng K, Ning Z, Zhang X, et al. MetaLab 2.0 enables accurate post-translational modifications profiling in metaproteomics. J Am Soc
                   Mass Spectrom 2020;31:1473-82.  DOI  PubMed
               37.      Santos-Júnior CD, Der Torossian Torres M, Duan Y, et al. Computational exploration of the global microbiome for antibiotic
                   discovery. bioRxiv 2023.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               38.      Xian F, Brenek M, Krisp C, Ravi Kumar RK, Schmidt M, Gómez-Varela D. Ultra-sensitive metaproteomics (uMetaP) redefines the
                   dark field of metaproteome, enables single-bacterium resolution, and discovers hidden functions in the gut microbiome. bioRXiv.
                   [Preprint] Apr 22, 2024. [accessed on 2024 Jun 28]. Available from: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.04.22.590295v1.
               39.      Fuchs S, Engelmann S. Small proteins in bacteria - Big challenges in prediction and identification. Proteomics 2023;23:e2200421.
                   DOI  PubMed
               40.      Nalpas N, Hoyles L, Anselm V, et al. An integrated workflow for enhanced taxonomic and functional coverage of the mouse fecal
                   metaproteome. Gut Microbes 2021;13:1994836.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               41.      Lagkouvardos I, Lesker TR, Hitch TCA, et al. Sequence and cultivation study of Muribaculaceae reveals novel species, host
                   preference, and functional potential of this yet undescribed family. Microbiome 2019;7:28.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               42.      Arumugam M, Raes J, Pelletier E, et al; MetaHIT Consortium. Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome. Nature 2011;473:174-80.
                   DOI  PubMed  PMC
               43.      Duan H, Ning Z, Sun Z, Guo T, Sun Y, Figeys D. MetaDIA: a novel database reduction strategy for DIA human gut metaproteomics.
                   bioRxiv. [Preprint] Mar 16, 2024. [accessed on 2024 Jun 28]. Available from: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.03.14.
                   585104v1.
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57