Page 338 - Read Online
P. 338

Page 10 of 15                                         Tanos et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:39  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2019.59

               throughout adolescence, there is a major opportunity for early diagnosis and treatment at the very initial
               stages when focis of 2-3 mm in diameter of endometriosis appear on the ovarian surface, accompanied by
               neoangiogenesis and chronic inflammation promoting adhesions, ovarian dysfunction and infertility.

               The main concern with regard to endometrioma surgery for adolescents is the high risk of future
               recurrence. A retrospective cohort study showed that long-term recurrence of endometriosis is higher
                                                              [55]
               amongst younger women as compared to older women . Larger cyst size and younger age were reportedly
               associated with recurrence in a 2014 retrospective study comparing recurrence rates across subgroups
                                               [56]
               of 550 women with endometriomas . In their 2017 study of adolescents with endometrioma who had
                                                                     [57]
               undergone laparoscopic cyst removal via enucleation, Lee et al.  found that 16.2% experienced recurrence
               after first-line surgery, and that recurrence rates increased proportionally to time since surgery. An attempt
               to strip the pseudocapsule to reduce the risk of recurrence will lead to the destruction of a high volume of
               healthy ovarian tissue with inadvertent high AMH results and infertility.

               Proposal for individualization of management by case identification
               Based on the literature, the clinical assessment of endometriomas requires endoscopic establishment of
               the diagnosis. High-risk adolescents, in addition to older women seeking fertility treatment, can benefit
               from early diagnosis of endometrioma. It is therefore essential that early identification of eligible patients
               is improved and standardized, through stepwise clinical reasoning and diagnostic testing as presented in
               Figure 2.

               Modern ultrasound scanning machines enable accurate diagnosis of endometriomas as small as 1.0 cm,
               depending on the knowledge of the operator and BMI of the patient [58,59] . In addition to diagnosing
               endometriomas, the myometrial and the sub-endometrial areas should be meticulously examined, as
               adenomyosis and adenomyotic cysts may be found; when endometriomas measuring < 3 cm are identified,
               we should proceed with TVHL. Bigger endometriomas can progress straight to IVF or be treated with
               laparoscopic surgery. Figure 2 outlines options regarding endometrioma management.


               Performing standard laparoscopic surgery using 5 mm bipolar instruments on small endometriomas < 5 cm
               minimizes the probability of preserving healthy ovarian tissue. Instead, smaller sized endometriomas enable
               an “easier” operation to be performed that results in less damage to healthy ovarian tissue, such as, surgery
               with 5F bipolar ball or Argon/Plasma jet laser . This also reflects the change to transvaginal surgery as a
                                                       [51]
                                                                                                [51]
               preferable technique over standard laparoscopy in the case of small endometriomas prior to IVF . Experts
               in reproductive surgery increasingly support the ablation method using bipolar techniques, avoiding
                                                       [60]
                                                                     [50]
               excessive coagulation and carbonization effect . Carrillo et al.  summarized various factors influencing
               post-surgery ovarian reserve, one of which was the competence of the surgeon as measured by the ability of
               the surgeon to minimize removal of healthy tissue, identify the extent of endometriotic infiltration and the
               borders of the lesion, and the ability to minimize coagulation during the procedure. The different treatment
               options of endometriomas in adolescents and very young women, according to their clinical characteristics
               are presented in Figure 2.


                                   [61]
               Recently, Roman et al.  proposed using plasma energy ablation as an alternative to cystectomy, finding

               first in their pilot studyof eight women that this technique may spare 90% of healthy ovarian parenchyma
               that would otherwise be removed during cystectomy. In a subsequent study (30 women with unilateral
               endometrioma and no previous surgery), they found a statistically significant reduction in ovarian volume
               and antral follicle count (AFC) (P < 0.001) among women who were operated by cystectomy as compared
               to those operated on by plasma energy ablation. This association was independent of age, previous
                                             [62]
               pregnancy, and endometrioma size .
   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343