Page 288 - Read Online
P. 288

De Rosa et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:34                    Mini-invasive Surgery
               DOI: 10.20517/2574-1225.2019.53




               Review                                                                        Open Access


               Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal
               cancer: state of the art


               Michele De Rosa , Greg Wynn , Fabio Rondelli , Graziano Ceccarelli 1
                              1
                                         2
                                                        3
               1 Department of General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista Hospital", Foligno 06034, Italy.
               2 Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, East Suffolk and North Essex Foundation NHS Trust, Colchester CO45JL,
               United Kingdom.
               3 Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia 06100, Italy.
               Correspondence to: Dr. Michele De Rosa, Department of General Surgery, “San Giovanni Battista” Hospital, Via M. Arcamone,
               06034 Foligno (PG), Italy. E-mail: michele.derosa@nhs.net
               How to cite this article: De Rosa M, Wynn G, Rondelli F, Ceccarelli G. Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer:
               state of the art. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:34. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2019.53
               Received: 3 Dec 2019    First Decision: 3 Feb 2020    Revised: 17 Apr 2020    Accepted: 29 Apr 2020     Published: 18 Jun 2020

               Science Editor: Giulio Belli    Copy Editor: Jing-Wen Zhang    Production Editor: Tian Zhang

               Abstract
               Total mesorectal excision remains the gold standard for surgical treatment for rectal cancer to achieve excellent
               oncological outcomes. The transanal approach to the mesorectum was introduced to complement conventional
               surgery so that technical difficulties related to the distal rectal dissection could be overcome. Since its introduction,
               interest in transanal mesorectal excision has been growing and it appears that the benefits are maximal in patients
               with mid-low rectal cancer where anatomical and pathological factors present the greatest challenges. Current
               evidence demonstrates this approach is safe and feasible, with an acceptable morbidity profile, but with specific
               complications related to the technique. Oncological and functional data seem comparable to the conventional
               approaches, but most of the results come from small studies with short-term endpoints. Robotics, when available,
               might potentially overcome the difficulty of distal rectal dissection with a shorter learning curve compared to the
               transanal approach, but with higher costs. The aim of this review is to critically evaluate the available literature
               concerning transanal total mesorectal excision so that we can better define its role in the management of rectal
               cancer.

               Keywords: Rectal cancer, total mesorectal excision, transanal total mesorectal excision, transanal surgery,
               laparoscopy



               INTRODUCTION
               Total mesorectal excision (TME) remains the gold standard approach to the surgical treatment of rectal
                     [1]
               cancer . The application of this key technical principle has represented a revolution in rectal cancer

                           © The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                    www.misjournal.net
   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293