Page 27 - Read Online

Page 4 of 5 Gagner. Mini-invasive Surg 2021;5:12 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.23

Consent for publication
Not applicable.

Copyright
© The Author(s) 2021.

REFERENCES
1. Gagner M, Begin E, Hurteau R, Pomp A. Robotic interactive laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Lancet 1994;343:596-7.
2. Begin E, Gagner M, Hurteau R, de Santis S, Pomp A. A robotic camera for laparoscopic surgery: conception and experimental results.
Surg Laparosc Endosc1995;5:6-11.
3. Schurr MO, Breitwieser H, Melzer A, et al. Experimental telemanipulation in endoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996;6:167-75.
4. Soulez G, Gagner M, Therasse E, et al. Catheter-assisted totally thoracoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: a feasibility study. Ann
Thorac Surg 1997;64:1036-40.
5. Garcia-Ruiz A, Smedira NG, Loop FD, et al. Robotic surgical instruments for dexterity enhancement in thoracoscopic coronary artery
bypass graft. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1997;7:277-83.
6. Margossian H, Garcia-Ruiz A, Falcone T, et al.. Robotically assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis in a porcine model: a pilot study. J
Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1998;8:69-73.
7. Margossian H, Garcia-Ruiz A, Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Attaran M, Gagner M. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical uterine
horn anastomosis. Fertil Steril 1998;70:530-4.
8. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 2001;413:379-80. Erratum in: Nature
2001;414:710.
9. Reichenspurner H, Damiano RJ, Mack M, et al. Use of the voice-controlled and computer-assisted surgical system ZEUS for endoscopic
coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:11-6.
10. Aybek T, Dogan S, Andressen E, et al. Robotically enhanced totally endoscopic right internal thoracic coronary artery bypass to the right
coronary artery. Heart Surg Forum 2000;3:322-4.
11. Cadière GB, Himpens J, Germay O, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 2001;25:1467-77.
12. Garcia-Ruiz A, Gagner M, Miller JH, Steiner CP, Hahn JF. Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of
basic manipulation and suturing tasks. Arch Surg 1998;133:957-61.
13. Dakin GF, Gagner M. Comparison of laparoscopic skills performance between standard instruments and two surgical robotic systems.
Surg Endosc 2003;17:574-9.
14. Wahba R, Datta R, Bußhoff J, et al. 3D Versus 4K Display System - Influence of “State-of-the-art”-Display Technique on Surgical
Performance (IDOSP-study) in Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Randomized Cross-over Trial. Ann Surg 2020;272:709-14.
15. Kang ML, Wong CMJ, Tan H, Bohari A. Han TO, Soon Y. A secondary learning curve in 3D versus 2D imaging in laparoscopic training
of surgical novices. Surg Endosc 2021;35:1046-51.
16. Jones GW. Robotic-surgery still requires skilled hands. Available from: https://www.docgiff.com/article/robotic-surgery-still-requires-
skilled-human-hands/. [Last accessed on 24 Feb 2021]
17. Jacob BP, Gagner M. New developments in gastric bypass procedures and physiological mechanisms. Surg Technol Int 2003;11:119-26.
18. Jacob BP, Gagner M. Robotics and general surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2003;83:1405-19.
19. Yamamoto S. Comparison of the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery, open surgery, and transanal total
mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: An overview of systematic reviews. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2020;4:628-34.
20. Aiolfi A, Lombardo F, Bonitta G, Danelli P, Bona D. Systematic review and updated network meta-analysis comparing open,
laparoscopic, and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Updates Surg 2020.
21. Mavrovounis G, Diamantis A, Perivoliotis K, Symeonidis D, Volakakis G, Tepetes K. Laparoscopic versus robotic peripheral
pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J BUON 2020;25:2456-75.
22. Feng LF, Yan PJ, Chu XJ, et al. A scientometric study of the top 100 most-cited publications based on Web of Science regarding robotic
surgery versus laparoscopic surgery. Asian J Surg 2021;44:440-451.
23. Ryan OK, Ryan ÉJ, Creavin B, et al. Surgical approach for rectal cancer: A network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, robotic
and transanal TME approaches. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021;47:285-95.
24. Ma J, Li X, Zhao S, Zhang R, Yang D. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
World J Surg Oncol 2020 ;18:306.
25. Ziogas IA, Giannis D, Esagian SM, Economopoulos KP, Tohme S, Geller DA. Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2021;35:524-35.
26. Wu HY, Lin XF, Yang P, Li W. Pooled analysis of the oncological outcomes in robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for
gastric cancer. J Minim Access Surg 2020;0.
27. Sforza S, Minervini A, Tellini R, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a large international
multicenter experience. Surg Endosc 2020.
28. Gall TMH, Alrawashdeh W, Soomro N, White S, Jiao LR. Shortening surgical training through robotics: randomized clinical trial of
laparoscopic versus robotic surgical learning curves. BJS Open 2020;4:1100-8.