Page 62 - Read Online
P. 62

Ornaghi et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2021;5:42  I  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.50                                Page 15 of 17


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.


               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.


               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2021.

               REFERENCES
               1.       Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 2020;70:7-30.  DOI  PubMed
               2.       EAU Guidelines. EAU annual congress Amsterdam 2020. EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands. Available from:
                   http://uroweb.org/guidelines/compilations-of-all-guidelines/ [Last accessed on 30 Jun 2021].
               3.       Abufaraj M, Foerster B, Schernhammer E, et al. Micropapillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a systematic review and meta-
                   analysis of disease characteristics and treatment outcomes. Eur Urol 2019;75:649-58.  DOI  PubMed
               4.       Mungan N, Aben KK, Schoenberg MP, et al. Gender differences in stage-adjusted bladder cancer survival. Urology 2000;55:876-80.
                   DOI  PubMed
               5.       Sadighian M, Porten S. Gender differences in oncologic and functional outcomes in patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical
                   cystectomy with urinary diversion. Curr Opin Urol 2019;29:542-7.  DOI  PubMed
               6.       Faba OR, Tyson MD, Artibani W, et al. Update of the ICUD-SIU international consultation on bladder cancer 2018: urinary diversion.
                   World J Urol 2019;37:85-93.  DOI  PubMed
               7.       Hussein AA, Elsayed AS, Aldhaam NA, et al. A comparative propensity score-matched analysis of perioperative outcomes of
                   intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic
                   Cystectomy Consortium. BJU Int 2020;126:265-72.  DOI  PubMed
               8.       Cacciamani GE, Rajarubendra N, Artibani W, Gill IS. Robotic intracorporeal urinary diversion: state of the art. Curr Opin Urol
                   2019;29:293-300.  DOI  PubMed
               9.       Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Marzouk KH, et al. Randomized trial comparing open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic
                   radical cystectomy: oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 2018;74:465-71.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               10.      Parekh DJ, Reis IM, Castle EP, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer
                   (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2018;391:2525-36.  DOI  PubMed
               11.      Ahmed K, Khan SA, Hayn MH, et al. Analysis of intracorporeal compared with extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted
                   radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol 2014;65:340-7.  DOI  PubMed
               12.      Benamran D, Phé V, Drouin SJ, et al. Functional outcomes obtained with intracorporeal neobladder after robotic radical cystectomy
                   for cancer: a narrative review. J Robot Surg 2020;14:813-20.  DOI  PubMed
               13.      Tuderti G, Mastroianni R, Flammia S, et al. Sex-sparing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal padua ileal neobladder
                   in female: surgical technique, perioperative, oncologic and functional outcomes. J Clin Med 2020;9:577.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               14.      Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that
                   evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:e1-34.  DOI  PubMed
               15.      Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann
                   Surg 2009;250:187-96.  DOI  PubMed
               16.      Kang SG, Kang SH, Lee YG, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: a multi-institutional study
                   from Korea. J Endourol 2010;24:1435-40.  DOI  PubMed
               17.      Whittum M, Hussein AA, Ahmed YE, et al. Gynecological organ involvement at robot-assisted radical cystectomy in females: is
                   anterior exenteration necessary? Can Urol Assoc J ;2018:E398-402.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               18.      Narayan VM, Seif MA, Lim AH, et al. Radical cystectomy in women: Impact of the robot-assisted versus open approach on surgical
                   outcomes. Urol Oncol 2020;38:247-54.  DOI  PubMed
               19.      Pruthi RS, Stefaniak H, Hubbard JS, Wallen EM. Robotic anterior pelvic exenteration for bladder cancer in the female: outcomes and
                   comparisons to their male counterparts. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2009;19:23-7.  DOI  PubMed
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67