Page 21 - Read Online
P. 21

Miller et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2021;5:24  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2021.25  Page 11 of 12

               15.      Zhang JH, Ericson KJ, Thomas LJ, et al. Large single institution comparison of perioperative outcomes and complications of open
                   radical cystectomy, intracorporeal robot-assisted radical cystectomy and robotic extracorporeal approach. J Urol 2020;203:512-21.
                   DOI  PubMed
               16.      Faraj KS, Abdul-Muhsin HM, Rose KM, et al. Robot assisted radical cystectomy vs open radical cystectomy: Over 10 years of the
                   Mayo Clinic Experience. Urol Oncol 2019;37:862-9.  DOI  PubMed
               17.      Moschini M, Soria F, Mathieu R, et al; European Association of Urology - Young Academic Urologists (EAU-YAU); Urothelial
                   Carcinoma Working Group. Propensity-score-matched comparison of soft tissue surgical margins status between open and robotic-
                   assisted radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2019;37:179.e171-7.  DOI  PubMed
               18.      Simone G, Tuderti G, Misuraca L, et al. Perioperative and mid-term oncologic outcomes of robotic assisted radical cystectomy with
                   totally intracorporeal neobladder: Results of a propensity score matched comparison with open cohort from a single-centre series. Eur
                   J Surg Oncol 2018;44:1432-8.  DOI  PubMed
               19.      Hanna N, Leow JJ, Sun M, et al. Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2018;36:88.e81-
                   9.  DOI  PubMed
               20.      Gandaglia G, Karl A, Novara G, et al. Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted vs. open radical cystectomy in bladder
                   cancer patients: a comparison of two high-volume referral centers. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016;42:1736-43.  DOI  PubMed
               21.      Tan WS, Sridhar A, Ellis G, et al. Analysis of open and intracorporeal robotic assisted radical cystectomy shows no significant
                   difference in recurrence patterns and oncological outcomes. Urol Oncol 2016;34:257.e1-9.  DOI  PubMed
               22.      Matulewicz RS, DeLancey JO, Manjunath A, Tse J, Kundu SD, Meeks JJ. National comparison of oncologic quality indicators
                   between open and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol 2016;34:431.e9-15.  DOI  PubMed
               23.      Nguyen DP, Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Wu X, et al. Recurrence patterns after open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder
                   cancer. Eur Urol 2015;68:399-405.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               24.      Atmaca AF, Canda AE, Gok B, Akbulut Z, Altinova S, Balbay MD. Open versus robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal Studer
                   diversion. JSLS 2015;19:e2014.00193.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               25.      Elsayed AS, Gibson S, Jing Z, et al. Rates and patterns of recurrences and survival outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy:
                   Results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. J Urol 2021;205:407-13.  DOI  PubMed
               26.      Brassetti A, Cacciamani G, Anceschi U, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with
                   totally intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD): a multi-center study. World J Urol 2020;38:837-43.  DOI  PubMed
               27.      Hussein AA, Elsayed AS, Aldhaam NA, et al. Ten-year oncologic outcomes following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Results from
                   the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. J Urol 2019;202:927-35.  DOI  PubMed
               28.      Hussein AA, Saar M, May PR, et al. Early oncologic failure after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Results from the International
                   Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. J Urol 2017;197:1427-36.  DOI  PubMed
               29.      Collins JW, Hosseini A, Adding C, et al. Early recurrence patterns following totally intracorporeal robot-assisted radical cystectomy:
                   Results from the EAU Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) Scientific Working Group. Eur Urol 2017;71:723-6.  DOI  PubMed
               30.      Raza SJ, Wilson T, Peabody JO, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes following robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the
                   International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. Eur Urol 2015;68:721-8.  DOI  PubMed
               31.      Hellenthal NJ, Hussain A, Andrews PE, et al. Lymphadenectomy at the time of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the
                   International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. BJU Int 2011;107:642-6.  DOI  PubMed
               32.      Hellenthal NJ, Hussain A, Andrews PE, et al. Surgical margin status after robot assisted radical cystectomy: results from the
                   International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. J Urol 2010;184:87-91.  DOI  PubMed
               33.      Herr HW, Faulkner JR, Grossman HB, et al. Surgical factors influence bladder cancer outcomes: a cooperative group report. J Clin
                   Oncol 2004;22:2781-9.  DOI  PubMed
               34.      Wilson TG, Guru K, Rosen RC, et al. Best practices in robot-assisted radical cystectomy and urinary reconstruction: recommendations
                   of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol 2015;67:363-75.  DOI  PubMed
               35.      Yuh B, Wilson T, Bochner B, et al. Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-
                   assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 2015;67:402-22.  DOI  PubMed
               36.      Marshall SJ, Hayn MH, Stegemann AP, et al. Impact of surgeon and volume on extended lymphadenectomy at the time of robot-
                   assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium (IRCC). BJU Int 2013;111:1075-80.  DOI
                   PubMed
               37.      Rai BP, Bondad J, Vasdev N, et al. Robot-assisted vs open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults. BJU Int 2020;125:765-79.
                   DOI  PubMed
               38.      Sathianathen NJ, Kalapara A, Frydenberg M, et al. Robotic assisted radical cystectomy vs open radical cystectomy: Systematic review
                   and meta-analysis. J Urol 2019;201:715-20.  DOI  PubMed
               39.      Dotan ZA, Kavanagh K, Yossepowitch O, et al. Positive surgical margins in soft tissue following radical cystectomy for bladder
                   cancer and cancer specific survival. J Urol 2007;178:2308-12; discussion 2313.  DOI  PubMed
               40.      Novara G, Svatek RS, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Soft tissue surgical margin status is a powerful predictor of outcomes after radical
                   cystectomy: a multicenter study of more than 4,400 patients. J Urol 2010;183:2165-70.  DOI  PubMed
               41.      Benson MC. Editorial comment. J Urol 2010;184:91.  DOI  PubMed
               42.      Karakiewicz PI, Shariat SF, Palapattu GS, et al. Nomogram for predicting disease recurrence after radical cystectomy for transitional
                   cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol 2006;176:1354-61; discussion 1361.  DOI  PubMed
               43.      Kluth LA, Rieken M, Xylinas E, et al. Gender-specific differences in clinicopathologic outcomes following radical cystectomy: an
                   international multi-institutional study of more than 8000 patients. Eur Urol 2014;66:913-9.  DOI  PubMed
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26