Page 77 - Read Online
P. 77
Ruzzenente et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2020;4:91 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2020.90 Page 13 of 15
Although a lot of hepatobiliary centers worldwide are already experienced in robotic liver surgery,
more and larger studies are necessary to define its real benefits compared with laparoscopy, in order to
standardize patient selection criteria and its use.
DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributions
Designed and performed the research: Ruzzenente A, Alaimo L
Collected the data: Conci S, Bagante F
Analyzed the data: Campagnaro T, Pedrazzani C
Supervised the work: Ruzzenente A, Guglielmi A
Wrote and finally approved the manuscript: Ruzzenente A, Alaimo L, Conci S, Bagante F, Campagnaro T,
Pedrazzani C, Guglielmi A
Availability of data and materials
A search of the current literature on robotic liver surgery was conducted in PubMed, Medline, PMC and
Google Scholar databases.
Financial support and sponsorship
None.
Conflicts of interest
All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
REFERENCES
1. Chong CCN, Lok HT, Fung AKY, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: application of the difficulty scoring system. Surg
Endosc 2020;34:2000-6.
2. Montalti R, Scuderi V, Patriti A, Vivarelli M, Troisi RI. Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a
propensity score-matched comparison. Surg Endosc 2016;30:1004-13.
3. Lafaro KJ, Stewart C, Fong A, Fong Y. Robotic liver resection. Surg Clin North Am 2020;100:265-81.
4. Marino MV, Podda M, Fernandez CC, Ruiz MG, Fleitas MG. The application of indocyanine green-fluorescence imaging during robotic-
assisted liver resection for malignant tumors: a single-arm feasibility cohort study. HPB (Oxford) 2020;22:422-31.
5. Pesi B, Moraldi L, Guerra F, et al. Surgical and oncological outcomes after ultrasound-guided robotic liver resections for malignant
tumor. Analysis of a prospective database. Int J Med Robot 2019;15:e2002.
6. Magistri P, Tarantino G, Guidetti C, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma: the first 46 consecutive cases.
J Surg Res 2017;217:92-9.
7. Fahrner R, Rauchfuß F, Bauschke A, Kissler H, Settmacher U, Zanow J. Robotic hepatic surgery in malignancy: review of the current
literature. J Robot Surg 2019;13:533-8.
8. Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, et al. The southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to
implementation. Ann Surg 2018;268:11-8.
9. Strasberg S, Belghiti J, Clavien P, et al. The Brisbane 2000 terminology of liver anatomy and resections. HPB 2000;2:333-9.
10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients
and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-13.
11. Nota CL, Woo Y, Raoof M, et al. Robotic versus open minor liver resections of the posterosuperior segments: a multinational, propensity