Page 18 - Read Online
P. 18

Shaker et al. Mini-invasive Surg. 2025;9:27  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2024.105  Page 11 of 17

               Table 2. Alternatives to LSG in obese patients with GERD

                RYGB
                LSG combined with an anti-reflux procedure (e.g., posterior or anterior fundoplication)
                ESG
               LSG: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; GERD: gastroesophageal reflux disease; RYGB: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; ESG: endoscopic sleeve
               gastrectomy.


               is guided by expert opinion. A group of 46 recognized bariatric and metabolic surgical experts from 25
               countries participated in a Delphi consensus to provide an algorithm for clinical decision-making in cases
               under consideration for revisional surgery after SG for insufficient weight loss, weight regain, and GERD .
                                                                                                       [67]
               The consensus was that multidisciplinary evaluation (91.3% agreement) along with at least 12 months of
               medical and supportive management (73.9% agreement after round 2) should be performed prior to
               reoperation for GERD after LSG. Most experts agreed on the importance of upper endoscopy (95.6%
               agreement) and upper GI series (82.6% agreement) prior to reoperation, although consensus was not
               reached regarding additional diagnostic evaluation such as pH monitoring or esophageal manometry,
               despite two rounds of voting. In cases of symptomatic GERD after SG and adequate weight loss, the
               consensus was that continuing medical treatment for at least 1-2 years (86.9% agreement) and RYGB (97.7%
               agreement) were acceptable. Despite two rounds of voting, consensus could not be reached regarding the
               suitability of magnetic sphincter augmentation with LINX. In cases of symptomatic GERD after SG and
               inadequate weight loss or with weight regain, recognizing the contribution of persistent obesity to GERD
               symptoms, 97.7% agreed that RYGB was an acceptable option. Finally, in cases of symptomatic GERD after
               SG and excessive weight loss, 97.8% agreed that RYGB was an acceptable option. Cruroplasty/HH repair
               was considered acceptable by nearly 57% of experts, but consensus could not be reached despite two rounds
               of voting. Similarly, magnetic sphincter augmentation was considered an acceptable option by up to 53.3%
               of experts in cases of symptomatic GERD after SG and excessive weight loss, but no consensus was reached.

               Overall, when considering revisional surgery following LSG, reevaluation with EGD or upper GI series was
               widely regarded as warranted, while controversy remained regarding whether additional testing was
               essential. In addition, in cases where medical therapy was deemed inadequate, the only revisional surgical
                                                             [67]
               approach to achieve expert consensus was RYGB . Studies informing the importance of medical
               management and evidence supporting the escalation to additional endoscopic or surgical intervention post-
               LSG such as magnetic sphincter augmentation or revisional RYGB are described below.

               In individuals who develop de novo reflux after LSG with adequate weight loss, expert consensus supports
                                               [67]
               that the use of medical management  is appropriate and reasonable, typically with PPIs as described in
               guidelines for GERD management . In fact, medical therapy has proven to be quite effective at managing
                                            [68]
               GERD  symptoms  post  LSG.  A  multicenter  cohort  study  of  379  LSG  patients  who  had  GERD
               postoperatively  found that, after excluding postoperative anatomic abnormalities as the etiology of
                            [47]
               symptoms, medical treatment with PPIs was effective in 79% of cases (n = 300). All patients experienced
               resolution of symptoms within two years, allowing for discontinuation of the PPI .
                                                                                   [47]

               More recently, potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) such as vonoprazan have become available for
               the treatment of both erosive and nonerosive GERD. A randomized controlled trial of 1,024 adults with
               erosive esophagitis demonstrated that vonoprazan 20 mg daily was noninferior, and superior to the PPI
               lansoprazole 30 mg daily for healing of erosive esophagitis, particularly in the patient group with severe
               esophagitis (LA Grades C/D). The study also demonstrated that vonoprazan 20 or 10 mg was noninferior,
               and superior to lansoprazole 15 mg for maintenance of healing . The safety profile of vonoprazan over 5
                                                                     [69]
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23