Page 42 - Read Online
P. 42

De Nardi. Mini-invasive Surg 2018;2:20  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2018.30                                             Page 5 of 7

               Table 1. Studies evaluating function and QoL in taTME
                                  No. of
               Studies           patients  Tumor characteristics  Function   Instruments   Time of evaluation
               Rouanet et al. [37] , 2013  21  Advanced or recurrent cancer,   FI  WS     12 months  after stoma
                                        complex anatomy or tumor                          closure
               Atallah et al. [39] , 2014  20  Low, mid locally advanced  or   FI  telephone survey  8 weeks after stoma
                                        distal rectal cancer + complex                    closure
                                        anatomy
               Elmore et al. [38] , 2015  6  Low, mid rectal cancer  FI   WS              Pre-operation,
                                                                                          6 months post
               Kneist et al. [41] , 2016  10  Low rectal cancer, colo-anal   Bowel, urinary,   IPSS, IIEF, FSFI, LARS,   Pre-operation ,
                                        anastomosis or partial inter-  sexual functions,  RUV, WS, QoL index  3, 6, 9 months post-
                                        sphincteric resection  QoL                        operation
                        [15]
               Koedam et al. , 2017  30  Any rectal cancer, with primary   Bowel, urinary,   EQ-5D,  QLQ-C30   Pre-operation,
                                        anastomosis           sexual functions,  QLQ-CR29, LARS   1, 6 months post-opera-
                                                              QoL                         tion
               Borreca et al. [36] , 2015  18*  Any rectal cancer  FI     WS              Post operation
               Tuech et al. [40] , 2015  52  Low rectal cancer, colo-anal   Bowel, urinary,   WS, interview  Post operation
                                        anastomosis or intersphincteric   sexual (male)
                                        resection             function
               *Total number of patients, only patients who had their stoma closed were evaluated but the number is not reported. WS: Jorge-Wexner
               score; IPSS: international prostate symptom score; IIEF: international index of erectile function; FSFI: female sexual function index; LARS:
               low anterior resection syndrome score; FI: fecal incontinence; QoL: quality of life; taTME: transanal total mesorectal excision


               had major LARS but no colostomies were required. Both the overall QoL and the colorectal cancer specific
               QoL score significatively decreased one month after surgery, but most outcomes returned to baseline after
               6 months, except for social function and anal pain. Urinary symptoms, incontinence, increased frequency
               or dysuria, did not change significantly after taTME. Sexual function significantly worsened at 1 month
               postoperatively, but returned to the same level as before surgery at 6 months. The authors’ conclusion was
               that taTME is associated with acceptable QoL and functional outcomes comparable with conventional
               laparoscopic TME. Table 1 summarizes the articles dealing with functional results in taTME.


               CONCLUSIONS
               Given the limitations of the existing studies larger studies have been advocated. Several studies exploring
               this novel surgical technique and the functional sequelae have been registered into clinicaltrial.gov, and
                                                                                    [48]
               some of them are already recruiting patients. Among them the COLOR III trial , an international, mul-
               ticentre, randomized trial, is expected to enrol more than 1000 patients in 4 years. In addition to clinical
               and oncological parameters, quality of life and functional outcomes will be assessed at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and
               36 months after surgery by means of specific questionnaires.


               In conclusion, published data concerning anorectal function, urinary and sexual function, and quality
               of life after taTME are still scarce and comparative data are lacking. Based on the few available studies,
               taTME does not seem to substantially impair functional and quality of life outcomes when compared to
               laparoscopic abdominal TME. However further studies are needed to confirm these results; the ongoing
               studies and particularly the COLOR III trial, will hopefully provide more firm updates for a more accurate
               assessment of this promising technique.



               DECLARATIONS
               Author’s contribution
               The author solely contributed to the article.

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47