Page 16 - Read Online
P. 16

Chouhan et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2018;2:18                    Mini-invasive Surgery
               DOI: 10.20517/2574-1225.2018.40




               Review                                                                        Open Access


               Is robotic rectal resection the preferred option for
               resectable cancer?



               Hanumant Chouhan , James Shin , Seon-Hahn Kim 1
                                             3
                                1,2
               1 Colorectal Division, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul
               02841, South Korea.
               2 Department of Colorectal Surgery, Monash Health, Melbourne 3175, Australia.
               3 Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, Sydney 2747, Australia.

               Correspondence to: Prof. Seon-Hahn Kim, Colorectal Division, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea
               University College of Medicine, Seoul 02841, South Korea. E-mail: drkimsh@korea.ac.kr

               How to cite this article: Chouhan H, Shin J, Kim SH. Is robotic rectal resection the preferred option for resectable cancer? Mini-
               invasive Surg 2018;2:18. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2018.40

               Received: 11 Jun 2018    First Decision: 2 Jul 2018    Revised: 16 Jul 2018    Accepted: 17 Jul 2018    Published: 20 Jul 2018
               Science Editor: Gordon N. Buchanan    Copy Editor: Jun-Yao Li    Production Editor: Cai-Hong Wang



               Abstract
               The ultimate goal of rectal cancer surgery is to achieve a negative circumferential, distal resection margin and intact
               mesorectal excision; however, controversy remains as to what is the best approach. Based on the current evidence, open
               surgery remains the “gold standard”, however recent improvements in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques with
               the introduction of robotic surgery and transanal total mesorectal excision have questioned the historical approach of
               open rectal dissection. A robotic system (da Vinci) overcomes many of the limitations of laparoscopic surgery. A robotic
               system is more like an open surgery: it gives a 3-dimensional magnified view, endowrist movements, has a shorter learning
               curve when compared with laparoscopic surgery, with the added advantage of an MIS procedure. However, the higher cost
               associated with robotic surgery has limited uptake of this approach in rectal cancer surgery in many parts of world.

               Keywords: Rectal cancer, open surgery, robotic surgery



               INTRODUCTION
               Complete mesorectal excision in the total mesorectal excision (TME) plane, as popularised by Prof. Heald,
               is the ultimate goal of rectal cancer surgery, as this technique has been shown to reduce local recurrence
               rates. The controversy, though, lies in defining the best approach to achieve good quality TME. Laparoscopic
               colorectal resection has been shown to improve postoperative pain, reduce blood loss, reduce the ileus rate,
               as well as lead to earlier recovery and hospital discharge . However, data on oncological outcomes after
                                                                [1]

                           © The Author(s) 2018. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
                           International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use,
                sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, for any purpose, even commercially, as long
                as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license,
                and indicate if changes were made.


                                                                                                                                                     www.misjournal.net
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21