Page 142 - Read Online
P. 142

Ambe et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2018;2:37  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2018.45                                          Page 7 of 13




































                                  Figure 2. The arrow indicates a desmoid plaque of the small bowel mesenterium

               dispose to anastomotic dehiscence, which is the most severe complication following IPAA. The hand-sewn
               anastomosis can be challenging and demanding in unexperienced hands. Continence function has been
                                                                                         [45]
               shown to be better following double stapling in comparison to hand-sewn anastomosis .
               The single - stapling technique following double purse-string is our preferred technique for IPAA. Out-
               comes with this technique are similar to the double-stapled technique. A major advantage of the single
               stapled anastomosis is the lack of interposition of staplers predisposing to anastomotic dehiscence.


               The need of a diverting ileostomy in patients undergoing IPAA for FAP remains a point of controversy.
                                                                                                    [46]
               FAP patients are usually young and otherwise healthy with no risk factors for anastomotic leakage . The
                                                                                   [47]
               rate of anastomotic leakage as high as 10% has been reported in this population . Due to the fear of dev-
               astating consequences following anastomotic leakage, some surgeons prefer to perform fecal diversion dur-
               ing IPAA. We generally do not routinely use a diverting ileostomy during IPAA. Instead we use a virtual
               ileostomy [Figure 1], which can be easily converted to a defunctional ileostomy in case of a clinically rel-
                                     [42]
               evant anastomotic leakage . We complete the procedure with the placement of a transanal decompression
               tube [Figure 3].

               MAP
               MAP is caused by biallelic mutations in the MUTYH (myh) gene. The MUTYH gene is involved in base
                                                                                                 [48]
               excision repair in the set-up of oxidative DNA damage by preventing G:C to T:A transversions . Unlike
               monoallelic mutations with predisposition to CRC with an autosomal dominant transmission, siblings of
               biallelic MUTYH mutations have a 25% chance of having MAP. This is based on the autosomal recessive
                                                                                                       [49]
               transmission pattern, indicating that parents and children of affected individuals are usually not affected .

               The clinical presentation in MAP is similar to that of aFAP, with tens to hundreds of polyps with proximal
                                                                             [50]
               colonic predominance by the age of 40-45 years found during colonoscopy . Although adenomatous polyps
                                                              [51]
               predominate, hyperplasic polyps are common in MAP . This is a major distinguishing histologic feature.
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147