Page 26 - Read Online

Page 10 of 13 Koc et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2018;2:7 I http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2017.33

related complications. Nevertheless RARP has low complication rates, it should be kept in mind that the
complications may be devastating if not noticed. Thus surgeons should pay full attention in prevention and
early management of complications.

DECLARATIONS
Authors’ contributions
Manuscript preparation, literature search and data collection: Koc E
Study design and definition of intellectual content: Canda AE

Financial support and sponsorship
None.

Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.

Patient consent
Not applicable.

Ethics approval
Not applicable.

Copyright
© The Author(s) 2018.

REFERENCES
1. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R,
Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann
Surg 2009;250:187-96.
2. Martin RC 2nd, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Ann Surg 2002;235:803-13.
3. Donat SM. Standards for surgical complication reporting in urologic oncology: time for change. Urology 2007;69:221-5.
4. Sotelo R, Nunez Bragayrac LA, Machuca V, Garza Cortes RR, Azhar RA. Avoiding and managing vascular injury during robotic-assisted
radical prostatectomy. Ther Adv Urol 2015;7:41-8.
5. Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hebert AE, Wiklund P. Positive surgical margin and perioperative
complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic,
laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:1-15.
6. Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Shariat SF, Stolzenburg JU, Van Poppel H,
Zattoni F, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Wilson TG. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-
assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:431-52.
7. Shekarriz B, Upadhyay J, Wood DP. Intraoperative, perioperative, and long-term complications of radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North
Am 2001;28:639-53.
8. McLaren RH, Barrett DM, Zincke H. Rectal injury occurring at radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: etiology and treatment.
Urology 1993;42:401-5.
9. Novara G,Ficarra V, D’Elia C, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Artibani W. Prospective evaluation with standardized criteria for postoperative
complications after robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57:363-70.
10. Wedmid A, Mendoza P, Sharma S, Hastings RL, Monahan KP, Walicki M, Ahlering TE, Porter J, Castle EP, Ahmed F, Engel JD, Frazier HA
2nd, Eun D, Lee DI. Rectal injury during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: incidence and management. J Urol 2011;186:1928-33.
11. Hung CF, Yang CK, Cheng CL, Ou YC. Bowel complication during rabatic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Anticancer Res
2011;31:3497-501.
12. Bishoff JT, Allaf ME, Kirkels W, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR, Schroder F. Laparoscopic bowel injury: incidence and clinical presentation. J
Urol 1999;161:887-90.
13. Jacobsen A, Berg KD, Iversen P, Brasso K, Røder MA. Anastomotic complications after robot-assisted laparoscopic and open radical
prostatectomy. Scand J Urol 2016;50:274-9.
14. Tyritzis, SI, Ioannis K, Constantinos AC. All you need to know about urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage following radical
prostatectomy. J Urol 2012;188:369-76.
15. Ramsden AR, Chodak GW. Can leakage at the vesico-urethral anastomosis be predicted after radical retropubic prostatectomy? BJU Int