Page 34 - Read Online
P. 34

Page 8 of 10                 Berger. Mini-invasive Surg 2023;7:24  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2023.30

               different methods are described. Due to the low caseload of single surgeons, a sufficient comparison of these
               techniques is almost impossible. Therefore, the repair must be concentrated in specialized centers to
               increase the caseload, providing adequate expertise and allowing studies comparing different approaches
               using a strictly standardized surgical technique. Nevertheless, the intraperitoneal sandwich technique seems
               to be the most effective one. For some reasons outlined above, polyvinylidene fluoride-based meshes must
               be used for the chimney and the sandwich technique.

               DECLARATIONS
               Author’s contribution
               Wrote the article, conducted the literature search, and provided the figures: Berger D


               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               Not applicable.


               Conflicts of interest
               Prof. Dieter Berger is “Medical Advisor” and “Trainer” of “Listo.academy”, which is powered by Dynamesh.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2023.

               REFERENCES
               1.       Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK. Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum
                   1994;37:916-20.  DOI  PubMed
               2.       Leong AP, Londono-Schimmer EE, Phillips RK. Life-table analysis of stomal complications following ileostomy. Br J Surg
                   1994;81:727-9.  DOI  PubMed
               3.       Ambe PC, Kurz NR, Nitschke C, Odeh SF, Möslein G, Zirngibl H. Intestinal ostomy: classification, indications, ostomy care and
                   complication management. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2018;115:182-7.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               4.       Maruo K, Tanaka T, Shindo T, et al. Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia after ileal conduit diversion in Japanese
                   population. Int J Clin Oncol 2020;25:1830-4.  DOI
               5.       Liu NW, Hackney JT, Gellhaus PT, et al. Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia in patients undergoing radical cystectomy and
                   ileal conduit diversion. J Urol 2014;191:1313-8.  DOI
               6.       Ghoreifi A, Allgood E, Whang G, et al. Risk factors and natural history of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit.
                   BJU Int 2022;130:381-8.  DOI
               7.       Feng D, Wang Z, Yang Y, Li D, Wei W, Li L. Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy and ileal
                   conduit diversion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Cancer Res 2021;10:1389-98.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               8.       Dewulf M, Hildebrand ND, Bouwense SAW, Bouvy ND, Muysoms F. Parastomal hernias after cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary
                   diversion: surgical treatment and the use of prophylactic mesh: a systematic review. BMC Surg 2022;22:118.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               9.       Moreno-Matias J, Serra-Aracil X, Darnell-Martin A, et al. The prevalence of parastomal hernia after formation of an end colostomy. A
                   new clinico-radiological classification. Colorectal Dis 2009;11:173-7.  DOI
               10.      Näsvall P, Dahlstrand U, Löwenmark T, Rutegard J, Gunnarsson U, Strigard K. Quality of life in patients with a permanent stoma after
                   rectal cancer surgery. Qual Life Res 2017;26:55-64.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               11.      Goffioul L, Bonnet P, Waltregny D, Detry O. Parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion: a narrative
                   review. Acta Chir Belg 2021;121:373-9.  DOI  PubMed
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39