Page 89 - Read Online

Page 18 of 19 Deivasigamani et al. Mini-invasive Surg 2023;7:9 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2022.99

renal masses: results from a cross-sectional study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022;20:e506-11. DOI PubMed
54. De Cobelli F, Papa M, Panzeri M, et al. Percutaneous microwave ablation versus cryoablation in the treatment of T1a renal tumors.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2020;43:76-83. DOI PubMed
55. Nielsen TK, Lagerveld BW, Keeley F, et al. Oncological outcomes and complication rates after laparoscopic-assisted cryoablation: a
European registry for renal cryoablation (EuRECA) multi-institutional study. BJU Int 2017;119:390-5. DOI PubMed
56. Sisul DM, Liss MA, Palazzi KL, et al. RENAL nephrometry score is associated with complications after renal cryoablation: a
multicenter analysis. Urology 2013;81:775-80. DOI PubMed
57. Lagerveld BW, Brenninkmeijer M, van der Zee JA, van Haarst EP. Can RENAL and PADUA nephrometry indices predict
complications of laparoscopic cryoablation for clinical stage T1 renal tumors? J Endourol 2014;28:464-71. DOI PubMed
58. McCafferty BJ, Huang JJ, El Khudari H, et al. External validation of the renal ablation-specific (MC)2 risk scoring system in
predicting complications from percutaneous renal cryoablation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2021;44:1763-8. DOI PubMed
59. Papa M, Suardi N, Losa A, et al. ABLATE: a score to predict complications and recurrence rate in percutaneous treatments of renal
lesions. Med Oncol 2020;37:26. DOI PubMed
60. Deng W, Chen L, Wang Y, et al. Cryoablation versus partial nephrectomy for clinical stage t1 renal masses: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. J Cancer 2019;10:1226-36. DOI PubMed PMC
61. Chan VW, Abul A, Osman FH, et al. Ablative therapies versus partial nephrectomy for small renal masses - a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2022;97:106194. DOI
62. Beemster PW, Barwari K, Mamoulakis C, Wijkstra H, de la Rosette JJ, Laguna MP. Laparoscopic renal cryoablation using ultrathin
17-gauge cryoprobes: mid-term oncological and functional results. BJU Int 2011;108:577-82. DOI PubMed
63. Wehrenberg-Klee E, Clark TW, Malkowicz SB, et al. Impact on renal function of percutaneous thermal ablation of renal masses in
patients with preexisting chronic kidney disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2012;23:41-5. DOI PubMed
64. Sriprasad S, Aldiwani M, Pandian S, et al. Renal function loss after cryoablation of small renal masses in solitary kidneys: european
registry for renal cryoablation multi-institutional study. J Endourol 2020;34:233-9. DOI PubMed
65. Mitchell CR, Atwell TD, Weisbrod AJ, et al. Renal function outcomes in patients treated with partial nephrectomy versus
percutaneous ablation for renal tumors in a solitary kidney. J Urol 2011;186:1786-90. DOI PubMed
66. Mues AC, Korets R, Graversen JA, et al. Clinical, pathologic, and functional outcomes after nephron-sparing surgery in patients with
a solitary kidney: a multicenter experience. J Endourol 2012;26:1361-6. DOI PubMed PMC
67. Uhlig J, Strauss A, Rücker G, et al. Partial nephrectomy versus ablative techniques for small renal masses: a systematic review and
network meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2019;29:1293-307. DOI PubMed
68. Ahmed M, Solbiati L, Brace CL, et al. Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria - a 10-year
update. Radiology 2014;273:241-60. DOI
69. Tsivian M, Lyne JC, Mayes JM, Mouraviev V, Kimura M, Polascik TJ. Tumor size and endophytic growth pattern affect recurrence
rates after laparoscopic renal cryoablation. Urology 2010;75:307-10. DOI PubMed
70. Maxwell AWP, Baird GL, Iannuccilli JD, Mayo-Smith WW, Dupuy DE. Renal cell carcinoma: comparison of RENAL nephrometry
and PADUA scores with maximum tumor diameter for prediction of local recurrence after thermal ablation. Radiology 2017;283:590-
7. DOI PubMed
71. Schmit GD, Thompson RH, Kurup AN, et al. Usefulness of R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system for predicting outcomes and
complications of percutaneous ablation of 751 renal tumors. J Urol 2013;189:30-5. DOI
72. Stacul F, Sachs C, Giudici F, et al. Cryoablation of renal tumors: long-term follow-up from a multicenter experience. Abdom Radiol
2021;46:4476-88. DOI PubMed PMC
73. Schmit GD, Atwell TD, Callstrom MR, et al. Percutaneous cryoablation of renal masses [greater than or equal to] 3cm: efficacy and
safety in treatment of 108 patients. J Endourol 2010;24:1255-62. DOI
74. Atwell TD, Schmit GD, Boorjian SA, et al. Percutaneous ablation of renal masses measuring 3.0 cm and smaller: comparative local
control and complications after radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:461-6. DOI PubMed
75. Aron M, Kamoi K, Remer E, Berger A, Desai M, Gill I. Laparoscopic renal cryoablation: 8-year, single surgeon outcomes. J Urol
2010;183:889-95. DOI PubMed
76. Breen DJ, King AJ, Patel N, Lockyer R, Hayes M. Image-guided cryoablation for sporadic renal cell carcinoma: three- and 5-year
outcomes in 220 patients with biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma. Radiology 2018;289:554-61. DOI PubMed
77. Thompson RH, Atwell T, Schmit G, et al. Comparison of partial nephrectomy and percutaneous ablation for cT1 renal masses. Eur
Urol 2015;67:252-9. DOI
78. Georgiades C, Rodriguez R, Azene E, et al. Determination of the nonlethal margin inside the visible “ice-ball” during percutaneous
cryoablation of renal tissue. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013;36:783-90. DOI PubMed
79. Nielsen TK, Vedel PF, Borgbjerg J, Andersen G, Borre M. Renal cryoablation: five- and 10-year survival outcomes in patients with
biopsy-proven renal cell carcinoma. Scand J Urol 2020;54:408-12. DOI PubMed
80. Ismail M, Nielsen TK, Lagerveld B, et al. Renal cryoablation: multidisciplinary, collaborative and perspective approach. Cryobiology
2018;83:90-4. DOI PubMed
81. Tanagho YS, Bhayani SB, Kim EH, Figenshau RS. Renal cryoablation versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Washington
University long-term experience. J Endourol 2013;27:1477-86. DOI PubMed
82. Martin J, Athreya S. Meta-analysis of cryoablation versus microwave ablation for small renal masses: is there a difference in