Page 10 - Read Online

Van Poppel. Mini-invasive Surg. 2025;9:13 https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2574-1225.2025.50 Page 3 of 3

Conflicts of interest
Van Poppel H is Guest Editor of the Special Issue Current Management of Small Renal Masses: Is There an
Optimal Choice? Van Poppel H was not involved in any steps of editorial processing, notably including
reviewer selection, manuscript handling, and decision making.

Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.

Consent for publication
Not applicable.

Copyright
© The Author(s) 2025.

REFERENCES
1. Mari A, Grosso AA, Coco S, et al. Predicting positive surgical margins in patients treated with robot-assisted partial nephrectomy:
results from a prospectively maintained dataset of a single tertiary referral center. Mini-invasive Surg. 2024;8:7. DOI
2. Pecoraro A, Diana P. Possible treatments for synchronous bilateral small renal masses. Mini-invasive Surg. 2024;8:29. DOI
3. Magaribuchi T, Masui K, Goto T, Saito R, Kobayashi T. Current status and challenges of 3D navigation in partial nephrectomy. Mini-
invasive Surg. 2024;8:6. DOI
4. Ditonno F, Franco A, Manfredi C, et al. Single port partial nephrectomy: techniques and outcomes. Mini-invasive Surg. 2023;7:36. DOI
5. Deivasigamani S, Adams ES, Séguier D, Kotamarti S, Polascik TJ. Cryoablation for the management of Small Renal Masses. Mini-
invasive Surg. 2023;7:9. DOI
6. MacLennan S, Wintner LM, Omar MI, et al. The need for core outcome sets in renal cancer clinical effectiveness research. Mini-
invasive Surg. 2023;7:23. DOI
7. Farinha RJ, Mazzone E, Paciotti M, et al. Systematic review on training models for partial nephrectomy. Mini-invasive Surg. 2023;7:38.
DOI