Page 13 - Read Online
P. 13

Page 38                                                   Braun. J Transl Genet Genom. 2025;9:35-47  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/jtgg.2024.79

               DMD patients [17,18,19] .


               Approved RNA-based therapies
               Several antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) chemistries have been developed and approved by the FDA and by
               the Japanese authority (vitolarsen). The current marketed products target mutations amenable to skipping
               exons 51 (eteplirsen), 45 (casimersen), and 53 (golodirsen and vitolarsen). However, these therapies have
               not yet been approved by the EMA. ASOs are small modified RNA sequences (20-30 nucleotides) that can
               be systemically delivered and specifically bind to a target exon during pre-mRNA splicing, preventing the
               inclusion of the exon into mRNA. Exon skipping can address certain deletions, duplications, and point
               mutations. However, due to the turnover of both ASO and the transcript and protein, repeated treatments
               are required [14,18] . More importantly, the ability of these therapies to produce truncated dystrophin remains
               very limited, with levels typically ranging from 0.4% to 6% of normal dystrophin expression, which are not
               sufficient for the biological protection of muscle fibers (estimated at 20% to 40%). These numbers are based
               on numerous studies conducted in both animal models and DMD and BMD patients [20,21] . However, the
               reliability of these figures is not guaranteed, as they may be influenced by factors such as the functionality of
               the dystrophin produced, individual variations, and species-specific specificities.


               Future directions
               Efforts are increasingly focused on developing more efficient chemistries that enhance biodistribution,
               extend pharmacokinetics (to reduce injection frequency), and target additional exons to expand the pool of
                             [18]
               eligible patients . The first ASO exon-skipping drugs were limited by low myocardial efficacy and
               suboptimal pharmacokinetics. To address these limitations, a new chemical approach based on
               tricyclo-DNA antisense molecules with better bioavailability has been designed  (NCT05753462) and is
                                                                                    [22]
               currently being evaluated in DMD patients, with results pending. Additionally, a novel retargeted ASO,
               AOC1044, a phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomer (PMO) conjugated to a truncated anti-transferrin
               antibody to enhance muscle cell uptake, has recently shown promising efficacy, with up to 25% restoration
               of dystrophin production compared to normal levels and up to 80% reduction in Creatine Kinase (CK)
                                          [23]
               levels in a phase 1/2 clinical trial (NCT06244082).
               Duplicated exons, including exon 2, one of the most commonly duplicated exons, are also eligible for exon
               skipping. Skipping of duplicated exons potentially restores a full-length (and thus fully functional)
               dystrophin. This approach is currently being investigated using an adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector
               carrying four copies of a modified U7 small nuclear RNA that contains antisense sequences targeting the
               splice donor (2 copies) and splice acceptor (2 copies) of the DMD exon 2  (NCT04240314).
                                                                            [24]

               However, the recruitment of patients with specific genetic subtypes within this already rare disease presents
               a bottleneck for drug development, which is further complicated by the individual variability in clinical
               scores over time. Additionally, to optimize statistical power and avoid bias, trial designs should prioritize
               matching comparative groups based on reliable, data-driven prognostic factors. Recent studies suggest that
               trial designs should avoid overemphasizing balance in genotype classification . This requires, for instance,
                                                                                [25]
               to include a natural history/baseline study to monitor clinical and biological evolution for at least 6 months
               before enrolling DMD patients. Part of the genotype effect may already be captured through baseline
               functional status, reducing the confounding influence of genotype. This is crucial for any type of therapeutic
               approach to DMD.
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18