Page 273 - Read Online
P. 273

Author Instructions
           7.3 AI Use in Peer Review
           Confidentiality requirements:
           • Reviewers must not upload manuscripts/materials to AI platforms, as this:
           1. Violates OAE’s confidentiality policies
           2. Risks intellectual property infringement
           3. May compromise personal data in identifiable content
           Review integrity standards:
           • Peer review must remain human-driven – AI tools cannot replace critical scholarly judgment.
           • Reviewers must not use AI for manuscript evaluation due to risks of:
           1. Inaccurate/incomplete assessments
           2. Algorithmic bias
           Declaration requirement: Reviewers retain full accountability for their reports, if any aspect of the manuscript’s evaluation
           was supported in any way by an AI tool, reviewers must explicitly disclose it in their report.
           OAE will periodically reassess this policy to align with technological advancements and academic standards.

           8. Conflict of Interests
           OAE journals require authors to declare any possible financial and/or non-financial conflicts of interest at the end of their
           manuscript and in the cover letter, as well as confirm this point when submitting their manuscript in the submission system.
           If no conflicts of interest exist, authors need to state “The authors declare no conflicts of interest”. We also recognize that
           some authors may be bound by confidentiality agreements, in which cases authors need to sate “The authors declare that
           they are bound by confidentiality agreements that prevent them from disclosing their competing interests in this work”.
           9. Editorial Process
           9.1 Initial check
           9.1.1 Initial manuscript check
           New submissions are initially checked by the Managing Editor from the perspectives of originality, suitability, structure
           and formatting, conflicts of interest, background of authors, etc. Poorly prepared manuscripts may be rejected at this stage.
           If your manuscript does not meet one or more of these requirements, we will return it for further revisions.

           9.1.2 Publishing ethics
           All manuscripts submitted to JMI are screened using CrossCheck powered by iThenticate to identify any plagiarized
           content. Your study must also meet all ethical requirements as outlined in our Editorial Policies. If the manuscript does not
           pass any of these checks, we may return it to you for further revisions or decline to consider your study for publication.
           9.2 Editorial assessment
           Once your manuscript has passed the initial check, it will be assigned to the Assistant Editor, and then the Editor-in-
           Chief, or the Executive Editor in the case of a conflict of interest, will be notified of the submission and invited to review.
           Regarding Special Issue paper, after passing the initial check, the manuscript will be successively assigned to the Assistant
           Editor, Guest Editor, and then to the Editor-in-Chief, or the Executive Editor in the case of conflict of interest for the Editor-
           in-Chief to review. The Editor-in-Chief, or the Executive Editor may reject manuscripts that they deem highly unlikely to
           pass peer review without further consultation. Once your manuscript has passed the Editorial assessment, the Assistant
           Editor will start to organize peer-review.
           9.3 Process
           JMI operates a single-blind review process, which means that reviewers know the names of authors, but the names of
           the reviewers are hidden from the authors. The scientific quality of the research described in the manuscript is assessed
           by a minimum of three independent expert reviewers. The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for the final decision regarding
           acceptance or rejection of the manuscript. For controversial manuscripts, the Editor-in-Chief is responsible for making the
           final decision.
           9.4 Decisions
           Your research will be judged on scientific soundness only, not on its perceived impact as judged by Editors or referees.
           There are three possible decisions: Accept (your study satisfies all publication criteria), Invitation to Revise (more work is
           required to satisfy all criteria), and Reject (your study fails to satisfy key criteria and it is highly unlikely that further work
           can address its shortcomings).
           10. Contact Us
           Journal Contact
           Journal of Materials Informatics Editorial Office
           Suite 1504, Plaza A, Xi’an National Digital Publishing Base, No. 996 Tiangu 7th Road, Gaoxin District, Xi’an 710077,
           Shaanxi, China.

           Whitney Xu
           Managing Editor
           editorialoffice@jmijournal.com

                 Journal of Materials Informatics                                                         XV
   268   269   270   271   272   273   274