Page 344 - Read Online
P. 344

Page 22 of 31                                     Paul J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2020;6:29  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2020.63

               parathyroid hormone - related protein and small cell carcinomas (SCC) of the lung typically produce
               calcitonin, adrenocorticotropin (ACTH), or gastrin releasing peptide (GRP). In some case for example,
               bombesin (BBS)-like neuropeptides secreted by SCC can act as autocrine growth factors [223] . Besides
               the involvement of cathecolamines in cancer described before, several other hormones (i.e., estrogens,
               androgens) are well known to promote cancer development and metastasis [224] . Also, the role of the thyroid
               hormones in promoting the metastatic process has been recently described [225] . Other hormones, like
               melatonin, for example, may inhibit cancer metastasis [226] . Patient with cancer have poor sleep and this
               may influence melatonin secretion. In a recent study done breast cancer women serum melatonin levels
               correlated significantly with self-reported sleep quality and psychometric profiles of depression [227] .


               INTEROGATING THE SYSTEM: CANCER INDUCED SYSTEMIC PATHOLOGIC NETWORKS
               In the recent years, liquid biopises and “omics” became useful tools of the developing field of precision
               oncology. Through liquid biopsies and “omics” we can interogate the global characteristics of the tumor
               itself, and obtain useful information that help us in the diagnostic, prognostic and treatment of cancer
               patients. In the near future, of great importance will be the characterization of the different CISPN through
               specific biomarkers designed to analyze the systemic cancer hallmarks. This information might be used to
               refine the staging and prognostic of patients with metastatic cancer currently lumped indiscriminatively
               under one large umbrella by the TNM staging and, also, design and monitor targeted interventions directed
               specifically against key CISPN that behave as master regulators of the metastatic process. Circulating
                                                                                [42]
               miRNA present inside the exosomes are plausible CISPN master regulators . Exosomal proteins isolated
               from plasma of cancer patients have been recently characterized not only as useful biomarkers associated
                                                                                                       [43]
               with several cancer types but also for dissecting different CISPN involvement in the malignant process .
               Potential systemic biomarkers might be also found analysing metabolomics data. In order for a tumor
               to develop and spread needs energy and, global metabolic reprogramming, might well be one of the key
               systemic cancer hallmarks driving cancer from its emergence through its progression and metastasis.
               The Consortium of Metabolomics Studies (COMETS) was established in 2014 to facilitate large-scale
               collaborative research on the human metabolome and its relationship with disease etiology, diagnosis, and
               prognosis [228] . Systemic metabolic changes in advanced cancers have been described in the past for several
               tumor types [229,230] . The essential role of metabolism at the cellular level in controlling cancer hallmarks
               was recently proven. Using molecular data of 9,125 patient samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas, a
               group of researchers identified distinct metabolic expression subtypes in 27 cancer types based on mRNA
               expression patterns of seven major metabolic processes (amino acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism,
               integration of energy, lipid metabolism, nucleotide metabolism, tricarboxylic acid cycle and vitamin &
               cofactor metabolism) [231] . The metabolic expression subtypes correlated with clinical outcomes: subtypes
               with upregulated carbohydrate, nucleotide, and vitamin/cofactor metabolism most consistently correlated
               with worse prognosis, whereas subtypes with upregulated lipid metabolism showed the opposite. The
               most interesting finding was that these metabolic subtypes were not related to specific genetic somatic
               drivers but were intrinsically coupled with cancer hallmark pathways (i.e., angiogenesis, cell division,
               etc.) and were modulated by highly recurrent master regulators across cancer types, ultimately leading to
               consistent survival patterns. As a proof-of-concept in vitro experiment, the authors also demonstrated
               that knockdown of two master regulators genes of carbohydrate metabolic subtypes (SNAI1 in a lung
               cancer cell line or RUNX1 in a sarcoma cell line) significantly decreased the concentrations of intracellular
               glucose. According to this model, the master metabolic regulators identified were key nodes with the
               greatest influence on systems-level metabolic activities and targeting these metabolic master regulators may
               inhibit tumor progression. Strikingly, all four master metabolism regulators genes identified in the 8 cancer
               types with significantly worse survival rates due to upregulated carbohydrate metabolism, SNAI1, RUNX1,
               RUNX2, and FOSL1 [231] , play also a key role in embryonal development and EMT [13,232,233]  and might be also
               master regulators of the metastatic cellular program [Figure 3].
   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349