Page 595 - Read Online
P. 595

Ralph et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2018;4:49  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2018.42                           Page 15 of 26

               Table 1. Summary of NSAID prevention against metastatic cancers in clinical trials.
                Type of cancer    NSAID      Treatment  Combination with     Clinical outcome       Ref.
                FAP              Celecoxib  400 mg bi-daily  None      Lowering polyp formation (30%)  [97,98]
                CRC              Celecoxib  400 mg daily  None         Lowering 5-year risk of advanced   [99,100]
                                                                       adenoma by 41%
                CRC              Sulindac  150 mg daily  +DFMO         3-year high risk adenomas lower by >   [101]
                                                         (750 mg daily)  90% vs. sulindac monotherapy (30%)
                CRC              Celecoxib  400 mg bi-daily  +DFMO     Decrease global polyp assessment by   [102]
                                                         (250-1250 mg daily) 80% vs. celecoxib monotherapy (33%)
                Proximal colon   Aspirin   75, 100, 300 or   None      50% reduction in deaths from CRC with   [103,104]
                                           600 mg/day                  metastasis free at diagnosis; 50%-70%
                                                                       reduction in distant metastases
                CRC              Aspirin vs.   Any dose  None          Long term low dose decreased CRC   [111]
                                 other NSAIDS                          mortality by 56% over 10-year follow-
                                                                       up & by 40% post-diagnosis mortality in
                                                                       KRAS wild type CRC
                Distant metastasis by   Several   pre- vs. post-  None  NSAIDS decreased incidence of   [120]
                Br or Pr Ca      NSAIDS    operative NSAID             metastatic cancer post-cancer diagnosis
                                           use vs. non-users           by ~ 50%
                Unretractable    Celecoxib  200 mg bi-daily  FOLFOX4   45% survival at 3 years, 4 CR’s  [168-172]
                metastatic CRC             400 mg bi-daily  Capecitabine  93/195 complete response rate
                REACT Her2-,     Celecoxib  400 mg daily               48% decreased recurrence after 2 years  [173]
                resected Br Ca.
                NSCLC meta-analysis  COXIBs              Chemotherapy  40% increase in response rates  [174]
                STAMPEDE prostate   Celecoxib  400 mg bi-daily  Zoledronic acid  22% increased overall survival at median   [175]
                cancer                                   (4 mg)        follow-up of 5 years
               NSAID: non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; CRC: colorectal cancer; Pr Ca: prostate cancer; NSCLC: non small cell lung cancer; DFMO:
               alpha-difluoromethylornithine; CR: complete response

               NAC or aspirin on cellular redox will depend on their relative concentrations, reaction rates and affinity
               for GSH (pro-oxidative effect) or the Cys-thiol groups on redox regulatory proteins such as the KEAP1/
                                                                 [110]
               NRF2 hub (antioxidant effect) vs. TrXR (antioxidant effect) .

               NSAIDs as chemopreventatives post-cancer diagnosis lower the incidence of recurrence or
               metastasis
               In a comprehensive study of 2,419 patients with invasive colorectal cancer during 1997-2008 from registries
               in the USA, Canada and Australia, with a median follow-up period of 10.8 years since diagnosis, survival
                                                                           [111]
               in the post-diagnostic non-users was compared with NSAID users . The results showed significant
               decrease in all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.75; CI: 0.59-0.95] and marked reduction in colorectal
               cancer specific mortality (HR = 0.44; CI: 0.47-0.86), notably with aspirin use. By comparison, the decreased
               mortality from any NSAID use post-diagnosis was only significantly improved in the Kirsten Rat Sarcoma
               (KRAS) wild-type protein expressing tumors (HR = 0.60; CI: 0.46-0.80), but not for the more malignant
               KRAS-mutant tumors (HR = 1.24; CI: 0.78-1.96).
               Beyond FAP and general colorectal cancer, the evidence is now sufficiently substantial for
               recommendations that the population consider taking NSAIDs regularly over the long term in low doses
               as a chemoprevention against all types of cancer [112-114] . Historically, many population-based longitudinal
               studies with other cancer types and patients prescribed NSAIDs have been reported, including several
               recent meta-analyses summarizing the findings [104,111,114,115] . The outcomes from many studies have
               consistently outlined the benefits accrued from using NSAIDs either in the setting of pre- or postoperative
               use to treat cancer [116] , and particularly in a manner similar to that with FAP, by lowering risks of
               recurrence or progression to metastatic cancer post-diagnosis [113,117-119] . Given the abundance of recent meta-
               analyses, such studies will not be reviewed here except for those having a direct bearing on the main point
               of this review - that the NSAIDs preferentially work when used as a therapy for advanced stage metastatic
               disease (for a summary of the clinical evidence, in Table 1).
   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   600