Page 26 - Read Online
P. 26

Page 10 of 12    Housman et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2021;7:69  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2021.159

               Finally, NCT04525859 at the Mount Sinai Hospital in New York is exploring the safety and efficacy of
               preoperative injection of Poly-ICLC on recurrence-free survival. The study will also evaluate induced
               serologic changes in circulating immune cells, including regulatory T-cells and natural killer cells.


               CONCLUSION
               While many aspects of treatment for MPM remain controversial, the literature shows that no benefit of EPP
               over P/D can be consistently demonstrated. Whatever theoretical benefits of EPP as a more radical
               procedure - if they exist - appear to be counterbalanced by a high frequency of complications, lower quality
               of life, and perioperative death. Recurrence remains a problem in the treatment of MPM with both
               techniques. To date, no study convincingly proves that EPP is more effective at preventing recurrence than
               P/D.


               Despite the absence of a randomized trial of surgical technique, P/D consistently displays lower morbidity
               and mortality with similar, if not superior, long-term survival [10,14,37] . Whether this is because it confers an
               oncologic benefit or simply avoids the hazards of EPP is unclear. Though further study is certainly
               warranted, EPP is a procedure that should be considered in select patients and experienced centers.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               Performed review of existing literature, evaluated existing studies, wrote and edited manuscript:
               Housman B, Wolf AS

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.


               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.


               Conflicts of interest
               Both authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.


               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2021.

               REFERENCES
               1.       Sugarbaker DJ, Wolf AS, Chirieac LR, et al. Clinical and pathological features of three-year survivors of malignant pleural
                   mesothelioma following extrapleural pneumonectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2011;40:298-303.  DOI  PubMed
               2.       Sugarbaker DJ, Jaklitsch MT, Bueno R, et al. Prevention, early detection, and management of complications after 328 consecutive
                   extrapleural pneumonectomies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:138-46.  DOI  PubMed
               3.       Berzenji L, Van Schil P. Multimodality treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. F1000Res 2018;7:1681.  DOI  PubMed  PMC
               4.       van  Gerwen  M,  Wolf  A,  Liu  B,  Flores  R,  Taioli  E.  Short-term  outcomes  of  pleurectomy  decortication  and  extrapleural
                   pneumonectomy in mesothelioma. J Surg Oncol 2018;118:1178-87.  DOI  PubMed
               5.       Wolf AS, Flores RM. Updates in staging and management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2020;29:603-12.
                   DOI  PubMed
               6.       Rice D, Rusch V, Pass H, et al; International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer International Staging Committee and the
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31