Page 13 - Read Online
P. 13

Page 8 of 11          Cox et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2021;7:25  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2021.55

               daily cone-beam computed tomography and auto-contouring using artificial intelligence [57,58] . Though CT-
               based automated re-planning could theoretically be performed on a daily basis, this is not realistic for FDG-
               PET-guided re-planning. FDG-PET should be reserved for re-planning based on metabolic tumor response
                                                     [44]
               once or twice during a course of radiotherapy .

               Second, there is the strategy of radiotherapy dose (de-)escalation during treatment. Several studies
               confirmed the feasibility of FDG-PET-guided “dose painting by numbers”, where voxel-wise dose escalation
               is related to FDG-uptake to produce a non-uniform dose distribution [59-61] . Currently two randomized
               controlled phase II trials are investigating whether radiotherapy dose escalation based on interim FDG-
               PET/CT can improve loco-regional control compared to standard radiotherapy (NCT01341535 &
               NCT01504815). However, in this era of concomitant chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy,
               it is debatable if radiotherapy dose escalation is a reasonable approach to improve outcome, especially since
               it may increase the risk of severe late toxicity such as mucosal ulcers . Therefore, we believe it is important
                                                                        [62]
               to keep the high dose volume (e.g., > 70 Gy) to a minimum. When using modern imaging, the target
               definition is more accurate and GTV-CTV  margins can be tighter [63-65] . Also, the traditional dose of 70 Gy
                                                   gross
               may be unnecessarily high for microscopic local tumor spread. Applying an intermediate dose of
               approximately 50-60 Gy to the periphery of the tumor may be adequate to eradicate small tumor extensions.
               This opens an opportunity for dose escalation to smaller, but highly active metabolic tumor volumes, or
               small tumor volumes that show residual FDG uptake towards the end of the radiation course, without
               increasing the risk of late squealy. In the future of HNSCC treatment, it remains highly important to explore
               the landscape of patient tailored radiotherapy-drug combinations and how PET-based early response
               assessment, next to genetic and biological tumor profiling, can steer this process .
                                                                                  [66]

               Opposite to radiotherapy dose intensification, interim PET treatment evaluation enables the opportunity for
               dose de-escalation in patients with favourable prognosis and excellent intra-treatment tumor response in
               order to decrease radiotherapy related morbidity. Clinical evidence regarding interim PET-guided dose de-
               escalation in well-responding patients remains scarce, especially in HPV-negative HNSCC and patients
                                             [67]
               treated with primary radiotherapy . Recently, a non-randomized controlled trial has been initiated to
               evaluate the safety of radiotherapy dose de-escalation in HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer, based on
               interim evaluation with FDG-PET/CT in week 2 of (C)RT (NCT04667585). Besides FDG, there are several
               other PET-tracers that can be useful for intra-treatment tumor response evaluation and adaptive
               radiotherapy, such as fluorothymidine (FLT), fluoro-ethyl-tyrosine (FET), fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) and
               fluoroazomycin-arabinoside (FAZA) [21,44,67-69] . Similar to FDG, week 2-3 of radiotherapy seems to be the
               optimal time-point for interim PET-evaluation with these tracers. Further discussion of these tracers is
               outside the scope of this review.

               CONCLUSION
               The use of FDG-PET/CT in patients with HNSCC has major implications for diagnostic staging and
               radiotherapy. High sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT for identification of smaller lymph node metastases not only
               has consequences for radiotherapy target volume definition and dose prescription, but also has prognostic
               implications. The use of FDG-PET/CT in radiotherapy planning opens a window of opportunity for
               treatment de-intensification of the neck in order to decrease toxicity without compromising oncological
               outcome. This concept is currently being investigated in the randomized controlled UPGRADE-RT trial.
               Further prospective trials investigating adaptive radiotherapy based on interim PET-evaluation are needed,
               especially regarding HPV-negative HNSCC and patients treated with primary radiotherapy.
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18