Page 51 - Read Online
P. 51

Casadei et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2022;8:21  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2022.05  Page 13 of 19

               drug is given subcutaneously. All eight FL patients who received the BsAb at a dose ≥ 0.76 mg obtained an
                                                      [104]
               objective response (100% ORR) with 25% CRR .
               Glofitamab is an intravenously administered, humanized mouse IgG1-based BsAb with a 2:1 configuration:
               its CD3-binding region is connected to one of the two CD20-binding regions through a flexible linker, thus
               enabling bivalent binding to CD20 on B cells and monovalent binding to CD3 on T-cells. CD20 bivalency
                                                                                                      [105]
               enhances the potency of glofitamab even in the setting of pre- or co-treatment with anti-CD20 agents .
               Moreover, the drug shows a longer half-life compared to the other BsAbs constructs. The phase I study
               (NCT03075696) in which the drug was evaluated included 44 patients with FL, who achieved 70.5% ORR
               and 47.7% CRR. Responders showed an mDOR of 10.8 months; in particular, 90.5% patients in CR
                                                    [105]
               remained in remission up to 22.9 months . Toxicities were manageable, with low rates of Grade ≥ 3
               CRS .
                   [105]
               Overall, BsAbs display promising results in pre-treated patients with FL, even among high-risk groups,
               although their ability to provide sustained remissions similar to those observed after CAR T-cell therapy still
               needs to be confirmed. A considerable advantage they have over CAR T-cells is their availability as off-the-
               shelf products, as well as not requiring administration of lymphodepleting chemotherapy. Moreover, their
               toxicity profile seems much more favorable compared to CAR T-cells, with lower rates of Grade ≥ 3 CRS
               and neurotoxicity.

               Checkpoint inhibition
               Currently, the application of anti-programmed cell death protein (PD) 1 and programmed cell death ligand
               (PD-L) 1 to FL is confined to clinical trials, although responses to these agents have been largely reported.

               A novel immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting CD47 has recently shown promising results in combination
               with rituximab in a phase Ib/II study enrolling patients with FL and DLBCL . CD47 is overexpressed on
                                                                                [106]
               the surface of cancer cells in multiple malignancies and works as a “do not eat me” signal to phagocytic cells.
               The binding of the blocking antibody (Hu5F9-G4) to the receptor induces the phagocytosis of lymphoma
               cells; their destruction is enhanced by the concomitant exposure to rituximab, which induces complement
               and NK cell-mediated, antibody-dependent, cellular cytotoxic effect. Among patients with FL, the ORR was
               71% with three patients (43%) obtaining a CR; the median DOR was not reached at a median follow-up of
               8.1 months .
                         [106]

               CONCLUSION: THE FUTURE OF FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMA
               FL is the most common indolent lymphoma in Western countries; thus, it represents a field where the still
               present unmet medical needs must be solved as soon as possible. As expressed above, the biggest failure to
               date is the absence of methods able to easily depict the biological and clinical heterogeneity of a disease that
               encloses many different conditions under a unique name. Consequently, in clinical practice, the standard
               therapeutic induction approach is composed of a chemotherapy backbone (mainly bendamustine or
               CHOP) and an anti-CD20 immunotherapy drug (rituximab or obinutuzumab), while small molecules,
               BsAbs, CAR T-cells, and everything we call “targeted therapies” are licensed for R/R patients or available
               up-front only in the context of clinical trials.


               Since the keywords of the contemporary era are “targeted therapy” and “personalized medicine”, we think
               that FL represents a great model where we can strive to achieve this future direction. As stressed in the
               manuscript, heterogeneity is very high among different patients, but it can also be present in the same
               patient at different sites. On the other side, as the drug armamentarium is huge, the goal should be to select
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56