Page 75 - Read Online
P. 75

Judson. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2021;7:28  https://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2021.110  Page 3 of 5

               tumour cell survival and increased expression of β-catenin, a potential tumour suppressor in this disease.
               Inhibition of GSK3β can induce apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells.

               Other sarcomas in which GSK3β has been shown to play a potential role include rhabdomyosarcoma, again
               possibly via the β-catenin pathway, synovial sarcoma, fibrosarcoma and undifferentiated pleomorphic
               sarcoma. GSK3β may also be involved in tumour-induced suppression of the immune response as well as
               being involved in doxorubicin-mediated cardiotoxicity, chemotherapy-associated neuropathy and impaired
               tissue repair. Inhibitors of GSK3β have been demonstrated to have antitumour effects in vivo in
                           [12]
                                                                    [13]
               osteosarcoma  synovial sarcoma and fibrosarcoma xenografts . To date there have been no clinical trials
               of GSK3β inhibitors in sarcoma but these data would appear to justify such a study.
               Another potential molecular target for sarcomas that involves the WNT pathway, but in this case the non-
               canonical β-catenin independent pathway, is ROR2 (receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor 2). In the
                                [14]
               paper by Tran et al.  in this issue, they describe the ability of ROR2 to inhibit anoikis, and hence increase
               the rate of pulmonary metastases in a mouse model of metastatic osteosarcoma, a process that involves
               activation of AKT. It is suggested that AKT inhibitors currently in clinical development might play a role in
               combatting the development of lung metastases in this disease. It is not clear whether this strategy would
               have any utility against established micrometastases. Clinical trials investigating treatment to prevent the
               development of metastases are hard to design. However, this pathway is worthy of further study and may
               shed further light on the metastatic process in osteosarcoma.


                                                                                                        [15]
               The next two papers concern different aspects of orthopaedic oncology. The first, by Pacheco and Righi
               from the Rizzoli Institute in Bologna, reviews malignant tumours of the bone surface. All sarcoma clinicians
               will be familiar with the distinction between parosteal osteosarcoma and conventional high grade
               osteosarcoma in terms of prognosis and need for intensive chemotherapy, in that the rare parosteal variant
               has a good prognosis and does not require treatment with chemotherapy unless it differentiates, in which
               case the prognosis is much worse. It is interesting to note that parosteal osteosarcoma is associated with
               chromosomal amplification involving both the MDM2 and CDK4 genes, something it shares with well-
               differentiated or dedifferentiated liposarcoma. They may be less familiar with periosteal osteosarcoma and
               bone surface tumours of cartilaginous origins, such as secondary peripheral chondrosarcoma, which
               originates in osteochondromas, and periosteal chondrosarcoma. All of these rare entities are very well
               described, in terms of differential diagnosis, along with appropriate radiological and histological
               illustrations, prognosis and management. The need for specialised multidisciplinary care is emphasised, as is
               appropriate.


               The paper by Pinnameni and Damron  concerns reconstructive procedures for the proximal humerus in
                                                [16]
               the cancer setting. Techniques for reconstruction in the pelvis, including hip replacement, a common
               procedure outside orthopaedic oncology, are well established. The proximal humerus represents a much
               more difficult technical challenge not least because of the proximity of major nerves and blood vessels but
               also the fact that stability of the glenohumeral joint is dependent on the surrounding muscles, which may
               need to be sacrificed in a cancer operation. This paper deals with the indications for surgery, both primary
               and secondary, the various techniques available, together with their pros and cons, both short term and long
               term and recent developments in technology, including prosthetics. The paper concludes with the fact that
               comparative studies are lacking to define the most appropriate reconstructive procedures, something that
               only prospective clinical trials could achieve.
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80