Page 80 - Read Online
P. 80

Malentacchi et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2020;6:34  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2020.34               Page 13 of 18

               lncRNA AND circRNA AND OTHER small nuclear/nucleolar RNA IN LB
               There are currently no studies available relating other circulating RNAs, namely lncRNA, piRNA, small
               nuclear (snRNA), and small nucleolar (snoRNA), to EC. The last three classes are also known as snc/
               snRNAs due to the fact that they are located in the cell nucleus and are fundamental in RNA-RNA
               remodeling, spliceosome assembly, and translation processes (i.e., post-transcriptional modification of
               rRNA). The class of snoRNAs named “U(n)” (i.e., U1 and U2-U12), due to their high Uridyl content,
               is involved in the spliceosome complex. These particular RNAs are 60-300 nt long and are transcribed
               from intronic sequences of coding and noncoding genes. Some of them are used to normalize the relative
               quantification of miRNA in tissues and fluids. Although they do not properly represent “housekeeping”
               due to their change and different pre-analytical phase, no specific studies have been conducted on these
                                                                    [88]
               biomolecules to evaluate their possible function as biomarkers .

               Concerning lncRNAs, they are involved in chromatin remodeling, gene expression and transcription,
               and protein-protein interaction, and their role in cancer is known with respect to snRNAs. Since this is a
               new field, for EC, pilot studies concerning circulating lncRNA are only relative to colon cancer and their
               prospective use [100] .

               Noteworthy, a peculiar class of lncRNA is represented by circRNAs characterized by a covalent linkage,
               which gives them a specific circular form and makes them biologically stable and resistant to RNases. They
               were recently investigated in several cancer tissues including EC. A recent paper highlights their differential
               display in a pilot study aiming to analyze three samples of EC in comparison to corresponding adjacent
               non-cancerous tissue and focused on has-circ_0039569, which has been significantly correlated with tumor
                           [88]
               differentiation .
               Recently, circRNAs - hsa_circ_0109046 and hsa_circ_0002577 - were suggested as potentially investigable
               biomarkers in LB of EC [101] .

               ROLE OF LB IN THE MONITORING AND TREATMENT OF ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
               Patients with EC progression after first-line chemotherapy have a poor prognosis. Until now, no targeted
               therapies are in use for ECC treatment, although several phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors are under
               investigation and in clinical trials. As for lung cancer, the evaluation of specific circulating mutations may
               give information concerning the success of the therapy and related to the development of specific molecular
               resistance or new clones [102] . Several studies have found that the genotyping results derived from tissue
               biopsy analysis differ from those derived from LB. The concordance rates for metastatic cancer patients and
               for patients with primary tumors were 83.3% and 78.3%, respectively. These discrepancies may be related
               to intra-tumor heterogeneity, indicating that the assessment on tissue can cause misinterpretations, while
               LB may reflect mutations and changes occurring in tumor that cannot be revealed in the primary biopsy.
               Thereby, LB may offer new prospective for monitoring tumor development, the efficacy of therapy, and the
                                       [36]
               arise of treatment resistance .

               CONCLUSION
               In 2013, the Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (TCGA) suggested implementing a classification
                                           [10]
               with molecular characterization , which can be useful to define targeted therapy and monitor cancer
               development and treatment; nevertheless, today, there are no targeted therapies: in fact, there is no
                                                              [11]
               molecular target for treatment, detection, or monitoring . LB represents a novel tool, due to the minimally
               invasive- or non-invasive procedure for biomarker collection, overcoming the limit of classical tissue
               biopsy and allowing the monitoring of tumor burden, the efficacy of therapy, the arise of resistance, and the
               development of cancer change, relapse, and metastasis.
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85