Page 397 - Read Online
P. 397

Page 10 of 13                                  Darbre. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2019;5:58  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2019.22

               incidence of breast cancer if sufficient of the constituent chemicals were absorbed either from long-term
               exposure on the skin (these products are not washed off) or from damaging the skin by shaving prior to
               cosmetic application [82,83] . This was proposed partly due to the disproportionately high incidence of breast
               cancer in the upper outer quadrant of the breast which is coincidentally also the site of application of
               these chemicals. Many years on, it is now known that many of the constituent chemicals can be absorbed
               through even intact skin after a single application [84,85]  and that they are measurable in human breast tissue
               or human milk (see above for references). Published studies have linked the levels of some of these estrogen
               disrupting chemicals in the body tissues with personal care product usage [86,87] . However, it is also clear
               that these chemicals are getting into many body tissues other than breast and therefore could be expected
               to create distant estrogenic microenvironments which could influence not only the growth of the primary
               tumour but also growth of metastatic tumours. If excessive use of personal care products is involved in
               the development of metastatic breast cancer, then reduction or cessation in use could provide a prevention
               strategy.


               DECLARATIONS
               Authors’ contributions
               This review was written solely by the author and reflects the author’s views.

               Availability of data and materials
               Not applicable.

               Financial support and sponsorship
               None.

               Conflicts of interest
               The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

               Ethical approval and consent to participate
               Not applicable.

               Consent for publication
               Not applicable.

               Copyright
               © The Author(s) 2019.


               REFERENCES
               1.   Darbre PD. Endocrine disruption and human health. New York: Elsevier; 2015.
               2.   Miller WR. Estrogen and Breast Cancer. London: Chapman and Hall; 1996.
               3.   Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell 2011;144:646-74.
               4.   Darbre PD. Molecular mechanisms of oestrogen action on growth of human breast cancer cells in culture. Horm Mol Biol Clin Invest
                   2012;9:65-95.
               5.   Engstrom W, Darbre P, Eriksson S, Gulliver L, Hultman T, et al. The potential for chemical mixtures from the environment to enable
                   the cancer hallmark of sustained proliferative signaling. Carcinogenesis 2015;36: S38-S60.
               6.   Russo J, Russo IH. The role of estrogen in the initiation of breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem Molec Biol 2006;102:89-96.
               7.   Lambert AW, Pattabiraman DR, Weinberg RA. Emerging biological principles of metastasis. Cell 2017;168:670-91.
               8.   Arnal JF, Lenfant F, Metivier R, Flouriot G, Henrion D, et al. Membrane and Nuclear Estrogen Receptor Alpha Actions: From Tissue
                   Specificity to Medical Implications. Physiol Rev 2017;97:1045-87.
               9.   Barton M, Filardo EJ, Lolait SJ, Thomas P, Magglioni M, et al. Twenty years of the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPER:
                   Historical and personal perspectives. J Ster Biochem Molec Biol 2018;176: 4-15.
   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402