Page 338 - Read Online
P. 338

Smigiel et al. J Cancer Metastasis Treat 2019;5:47  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-4722.2019.26                           Page 3 of 20

               tumors can be treated with antibodies or kinase inhibitors targeting HER2 signaling (i.e., Trastuzamab and
               Lapatinib) and are often met with success provided the disease is caught early; the efficacy of these therapies
               drastically decreases with late stage, metastatic HER2+ BC [20-23] . Conversely, TNBC currently lacks a targeted
               therapy tailored to a specific driver oncogene and is most often treated with cytotoxic chemotherapies.
               Patients with TNBC exhibit an increased risk of metastatic dissemination resulting in higher clinical stage
               at diagnosis and lower disease-free survival compared to patients with non-TNBC cancers . Much like
                                                                                              [24]
               metastatic HER2+ BC, metastatic TNBC is not effectively treated, highlighting the need for better therapies
               targeting those cells which progress beyond the primary site and are ultimately responsible for patient
               mortality and morbidity. Further challenges in treating BC involve the heterogeneous nature of the tumor
               cells themselves, a phenomenon often referred to as intra-tumoral heterogeneity (ITH) . Evidence suggests
                                                                                        [25]
               that across a panel of human cancers, including breast, increased ITH correlates with decreased overall
               survival, and therapy resistance [26,27] . Furthermore, high ITH inversely correlates with low tumor infiltrating
               lymphocytes, which are often associated with increased patient survival [28-36] .

               The path to ITH is complex and involves a series of genetic and epigenetic events throughout the transformation
               process which permit normal human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) to develop into fully malignant
               cancer cells [37-44] . Progress in RNA and DNA sequencing technologies have helped shape the evolutionary
               picture of HMEC; losing tumor suppressor function (TP53 mutations or RB loss) and acquiring oncogenic
               drivers (MYC, HER2, or CCND1 amplification or PIK3CA mutations) [45-49] . Genetic alterations lead to the
               expansion of a pre-malignant population which progressively acquires additional genetic and epigenetic
               changes until one or more cells become fully transformed [50,51] . These additional mutations are numerous, and
               genomic profiling has found a wide variety of changes in copy number, chromatin alterations, chromosomal
               rearrangements, and point mutations throughout the genome from single cell sequencing of bulk tumor
               tissue in TNBC [36,52,53] . Not only does this dynamic process of transformation alter the cancer cell itself, but
               transforming cells have a substantial impact on the surrounding environment. Evidence suggests that the
               accumulation of mutations within epithelial cells can lead to a dysregulated secretory network, including a
               number of inflammatory cytokines linked to poor prognosis, therapy failure, and disease recurrence (IL-6,
               IL-8, TGF-β, CCL2, TNF-α, IL-17 and others) [54-59] . This dysregulated secretory network in turn, changes
               the cellular composition of the TME, leading to a reciprocal cross-talk between non-cancerous stromal cells
               and the transforming epithelial cells. Overall, this demonstrates the immense complexity of the tumor, as
               the heterogeneity described above culminates in a highly diverse TME, with an array of cell types, secreted
               factors, and structural make up.

               Importantly, not all epithelial cells that begin the transformation process reach full malignancy. As a cell
               senses aberrant activation of signaling pathways/gene induction, it may enact intact tumor suppressive
               mechanisms, resulting in senescence [60-66] . Senescence is a major growth-inhibiting and tumor-suppressive
               barrier that must be bypassed in vivo during transformation en-route to tumor development [63,67-73] . Large
               senescent cell populations can be found at various stages of tumor development, further contributing to
               tumor heterogeneity. Remarkably, an investigation by Cotarelo et al.  was able to identify the presence
                                                                           [74]
               of senescent cells in approximately 83.7% of the human invasive breast carcinomas examined, suggesting
               their involvement throughout the transformation process and as tumors evolve and progress. Since the 129
               tumors surveyed in this study were from untreated patients, the origin of senescence within these invasive
               BC is an in vivo physiological response.

               Long thought inert, bystanders within the tumor, senescent cells have gained considerable interest for their
               potential impact on the tumor as a whole. Despite being growth-arrested, senescent cells remain viable,
               metabolically active, and play an important role in the developing TME [75-77] . A hallmark of senescent cells is
               the secretion of a wide variety of growth factors, pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and proteinases,
               a characteristic termed the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) [Figure 1] [78,79] . Under normal
   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343