Page 810 - Read Online
P. 810

Page 4 of 15                                       Alqahtani et al. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:70  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.65

               Table 1. Chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced CCA: an overview of pivotal clinical trials
                                                                         Median OS
                Trial             Phase        Regimen        N                             Response rate
                                                                        [HR (95%CI)]
                ABC-02 [29]         III  Gem-Cis vs. Gem     410    11.7 months vs. 8.1 months  DCR: 81.4% vs. 71.8%
                                                                    0.640 (52-0.80)
                Okusaka et al. [30]  II  Gem-Cis vs. Gem     83     11.2 months vs. 7.7 months  ORR: 19.5% vs. 11.9%
                                                                    0.69 (0.42-1.13)     DCR: 68.3% vs. 50.0%
                FUGA-BT [32]        III  Gem-Cis vs. Gem-S1  354    13.4 months vs. 15.1 months  ORR: 29.8% vs. 32.4%
                                                                    0.945 (0.78-1.15)*
                GERCOR [33]#        II   GEMOX               33     15.4 months          ORR: 36%
                Kim et al. [34]     III  GEMOX vs. XELOX     222    10.4 months vs. 10.6 months  ORR: 24.6% vs. 15.7%
                                                                    NR                   DCR: 63.2% vs. 58.3%
                Shroff et al. [36]  II   Gem-Cis + nab-paclitaxel  60  19.2 months       ORR: 45%
                                                                                         DCR: 84%
                KHBO1401-MITSUBA [37]    III  Gem-Cis vs. Gem-Cis-S1  246  13.5 months vs. 12.6 months  ORR: 41.5% vs. 15%
                                                                    0.79 (0.60-1.04)
                                                             #
               *90% confidence interval. Study met threshold for non-inferiority;  only data for Group A (good performance status) are listed here.
               CCA: cholangiocarcinoma; DCR: disease control rate; ORR: overall response rate; OS: overall survival

               Table 1 lists the pivotal clinical trials which study various chemotherapy options in the first-line treatment
               of patients with advanced CCA.

               Gemcitabine-based doublet chemotherapy
               To improve on these outcomes, numerous gemcitabine-based combination regimens have been tested.
               The most prominent consists of the gemcitabine-cisplatin (Gem-Cis) doublet. Two phase-II trials of
               the combination produced efficacy signals in patients with advanced CCA and had a favorable toxicity
               profile [27,28] . These encouraging findings formed the rationale for comparing the Gem-Cis doublet to
               gemcitabine alone in a randomized phase III trial: In the ABC-02 study, 410 patients with locally advanced
               or metastatic CCA, gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin
                        2
                                                         2
               (25 mg/m ) followed by gemcitabine (1000 mg/m  on Days 1 and 8, every three weeks for eight cycles) or
               gemcitabine alone (1000 mg/m  on Days 1, 8, and 15, every four weeks for six cycles) for a total of 24 weeks.
                                         2
               Study patients who received the combination treatment had a median OS of 11.7 months, which was
               significantly longer than 8.1 months in the gemcitabine-treated cohort (HR = 0.64, 95%CI: 0.52-0.80, P <
               0.001); the PFS also was significantly longer (median PFS: 8 months vs. 5 months; P < 0.001) in patients
               treated with the chemotherapy doublet, and the tumor was controlled in significantly more patients (81.4%
                                 [29]
               vs. 71.8%; P = 0.049) . Toxicity was similar with the two treatments, but the addition of cisplatin to the
               regimen resulted in more Grade 3/4 neutropenia (25% vs. 17%) and a higher incidence of Grade 3/4 liver
                                       [29]
               abnormalities (27% vs. 17%) . A similar efficacy benefit of Gem-Cis over gemcitabine alone was reported
                              [30]
               by Okusaka et al. , with a median OS of 11.2 months with the combination compared with 7.7 months
               with gemcitabine alone (HR = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.42-1.13); at the one-year mark, this difference translated into
                                               [30]
               an absolute survival difference of 8% . A subsequent meta-analysis of these two studies indicated that,
               compared to gemcitabine alone, Gem-Cis was associated with a 35% reduced death risk (HR = 0.65, 95%CI:
               0.54-0.78, P < 0.001) and a 36% reduced risk for disease progression (HR = 0.64, 95%CI: 0.53-0.76, P <
               0.001). The benefit of Gem-Cis over gemcitabine monotherapy was present irrespective of the location of
               the primary tumor (i.e., gallbladder or CCA). These findings established Gem-Cis as the reference first-line
               treatment for patients with advanced CCA. However, a subgroup analysis of the performance status found
               that the superiority of Gem-Cis over gemcitabine alone was mainly in patients with good performance
               status, whereas patients with a European Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or
               more benefited less .
                               [31]
               A second gemcitabine-based doublet regimen that has gained momentum in recent years is the
               combination of gemcitabine and S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine that includes three agents (tegafur, gimeracil,
   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815