Page 573 - Read Online
P. 573

Toniutto et al. Hepatoma Res 2020;6:50  I  http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/2394-5079.2020.40                                        Page 13 of 21

               HCC recurrence  [127-129] . A further mechanism could be linked to the short waiting time on LDLT
               waiting lists [130,131] . This short waiting time may not be able to highlight tumors with greater biological
               aggressiveness, expressed as having rapid growth over time. Finally, the LDLT technique associated with
               sparing of the inferior vena cava and with more extensive manipulation of the liver during transplant
               operations may contribute towards increasing the risk of HCC recurrence [132] . The same considerations
               may be applied to LT performed by the piggyback technique with cadaveric donors since it theoretically
               carries a higher risk of positive vena cava margins and requires greater manipulation of the diseased liver,
               thus leading to an increased risk of HCC spread [133] . Nevertheless, it remains important to highlight that
               the piggyback technique is the preferred approach in many liver transplant centers since it provides several
               advantages compared to conventional techniques, such as shorter operation times, anhepatic phases, warm
               ischemia times, and stays in intensive care units [132,134] .

               Graft and donor-related factors
               Besides the use of partial grafts for LT, several reports have indicated that prolonged cold and warm
               ischemia times could be associated with an increased risk of HCC recurrence [135] . Multiple biological
               mechanisms have been proffered to explain how ischemia-reperfusion injury can affect the risk of HCC
               recurrence, based on in vivo and in vitro experiments [136-138]  One of these mechanisms hypothesizes that
               the exposure of micrometastases to prolonged hypoxia could lead to the abnormal expression of genes and
               cytokines that increase angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and growth [136] . Notably, it has been hypothesized
               that female grafts may be more susceptible to ischemia-reperfusion injury and may have increased
               sensitivity to reoxygenation damage following prolonged cold storage [139,140] . Furthermore, hypoxia stabilizes
               and activates the transcription factor for hypoxia - inducible factor, which represents a key oxygen
               response regulator able to activate the transcription of genes stimulating angiogenesis such VEGF-A [141,142] .
               However, the relationship between prolonged graft ischemia time and the risk of HCC recurrence was most
               convincing in recipients who presented additional risk factors for recurrence at baseline, such as HCC
               beyond the Milan criteria, the presence of MVI, or high AFP serum levels [126] .

               The increased susceptibility to ischemia-reperfusion injury of older grafts support some observations, thus
               indicating that recipients transplanted with older donors experienced HCC recurrence more frequently
               than those transplanted with younger donors [143] . Although these observations are of interest, previous
               studies have not confirmed them in subsequent studies [144,145] .


               Given the growing number of donors with metabolic syndrome, one aspect that appears to be of particular
               interest is the potential impact of graft steatosis on the risk of HCC recurrence. It has been accepted that
               grafts with moderate to severe steatosis present low tolerability to ischemia-reperfusion injury [146] . This
               injury may be able to promote a release of lipid peroxides and downregulate the secretion of adipokines
               that can protect the steatotic grafts [147] . Thus, the induced inflammatory cascade within the graft could
               be responsible for the increase in angiogenesis, which is considered the key factor in promoting tumor
               recurrence. All of these observations have not been validated in prospective studies and a large number of
               patients; thus, no current evidence exists to modify the allocation criteria for steatotic grafts based on the
               presence of HCC in recipients.


               There is emerging evidence that persistent HBV infection contributes to cancer development within the
               liver, increasing genetic instability of and promoting hepatocyte destruction and regeneration. Several
               reports indicate that in patients transplanted for HCC related to chronic HBV infection, the reappearance
               of active HBV replication in the graft was associated with an increased risk of HCC recurrence and with
               shorter overall survival [126] . These reports were more frequent in the past when prophylaxis against HBV
               recurrence was given only with immunoglobulins against HBV or with Lamivudine.
   568   569   570   571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578